Aguilarramos v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
| Dogoberto Aguilarramos |
| Colorado Dept. of Corrections and S. Green |
| 1:2018cv02385 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Preliminary RESPONSE to #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Attorney James Xavier Quinn added to party Colorado Dept. of Corrections(pty:res), Attorney James Xavier Quinn added to party S. Green(pty:res)Attorney James Xavier Quinn added to party Colorado Dept. of Corrections(pty:res), Attorney James Xavier Quinn added to party S. Green(pty:res) by Colorado Dept. of Corrections, S. Green. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Quinn, James) |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Service of Order to File Preliminary Response and an Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon Colorado Department of Corrections, and Steven Green on 10/30/2018 (evana, ) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #9 Second Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process (rroge, ) |
Filing 9
SECOND ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE within twenty-one days from the date of this Order, Respondents shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the filing of the Response, Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. It is FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondents do not intend to raise either of the affirmative defenses of timeliness or exhaustion of state court remedies, Respondents must notify the Court of that decision in the Preliminary Response, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/30/2018. (evana, )
|
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RETURN of Service of the Order to File Preliminary Response and an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus upon Steven Green on 10/16/2018, by CDOC (evana, ) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 Order TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE for Service of Process (rroge, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE it is ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of this Order, Respondents shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the filing of the Response, Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. It is FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondents do not intend to raise either of the affirmative defenses of timeliness or exhaustion of state court remedies, Respondents must notify the Court of that decision in the Preliminary Response, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/3/2018. (evana, )
|
| Filing 4 LETTER re: Filing Fee by Petitioner Dogoberto Aguilarramos. (angar, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies. If Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/19/2018. (angar, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Dogoberto Aguilarramos. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement)(rroge, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
