Juul Labs, Inc. v. Electric Tobacconist, LLC, The
| Juul Labs, Inc. |
| Electronic Tobacconist, LLC, The and Electric Tobacconist, LLC, The |
| 1:2018cv02546 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part #12 Joint Motion to Extend Defendants Time to Respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint and to Continue the Scheduling/Planning Conference, by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 11/27/2018. ORDERED that Defendant shall file an answer or other responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint on or before December 13, 2018. Plaintiffs request that the December 17, 2018 Scheduling Conference be continued is DENIED. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing 13
MEMORANDUM regarding #12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint,,,, #6 Order to Continue Scheduling Conference filed on behalf of the Parties filed by Juul Labs, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/27/2018. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint,,,, #6 Order to Continue Scheduling Conference filed on behalf of the Parties by Plaintiff Juul Labs, Inc.. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (athom, ) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS REQUEST as to THE ELECTRIC TOBACCONIST, LLC re #9 Amended Complaint,,,, by Plaintiff Juul Labs, Inc.. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Electric Tobacconist, LLC, The, filed by Juul Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Redline of Amended Complaint Against Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21, #23 Exhibit 22, #24 Exhibit 23, #25 Exhibit 24, #26 Exhibit 25, #27 Exhibit 26, #28 Exhibit 27, #29 Exhibit 28, #30 Exhibit 29, #31 Exhibit 30, #32 Exhibit 31, #33 Exhibit 32, #34 Exhibit 33, #35 Exhibit 34, #36 Exhibit 35, #37 Exhibit 36, #38 Exhibit 37, #39 Exhibit 38 (Part 1 of 2), #40 Exhibit 38 (Part 2 of 2), #41 Exhibit 39 (Part 1 of 3), #42 Exhibit 39 (Part 2 of 3), #43 Exhibit 39 (Part 3 of 3), #44 Exhibit 40, #45 Exhibit 41, #46 Exhibit 42, #47 Exhibit 43, #48 Exhibit 44, #49 Exhibit 45)(Kass, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juul Labs, Inc.. Electric Tobacconist, LLC, The served on 10/11/2018, answer due 11/1/2018. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Kass, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (rvill, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference for 12/17/2018 11:00 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter, by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 10/09/2018. (slibi, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Magistrate Judge Neureiter is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 90 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for trial accordingly. FURTHER, Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/5/2018. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rvill, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Kass, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND, filed against Electronic Tobacconist, LLC, The (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6329469)Attorney Jeffrey H. Kass added to party Juul Labs, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Juul Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8 (part 1 of 2), #9 Exhibit 8 (part 2 of 2), #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16 (part 1 of 2), #18 Exhibit 16 (part 2 of 2), #19 Exhibit 17, #20 Exhibit 18, #21 Exhibit 19, #22 Exhibit 20, #23 Exhibit 21, #24 Exhibit 22, #25 Exhibit 23, #26 Exhibit 24 (part 1 of 2), #27 Exhibit 24 (part 2 of 2), #28 Exhibit 25, #29 Exhibit 26, #30 Exhibit 27, #31 Exhibit 28, #32 Exhibit 29, #33 Exhibit 30, #34 Exhibit 31, #35 Exhibit 32 (part 1 of 2), #36 Exhibit 32 (part 2 of 2), #37 Exhibit 33, #38 Exhibit 34, #39 Exhibit 35, #40 Exhibit 36, #41 Exhibit 37, #42 Exhibit 38, #43 Civil Cover Sheet, #44 Summons)(Kass, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
