Brooks v. Hanson et al
Jason Brooks |
Matthew Hanson and Cynthia Coffman |
1:2018cv02666 |
October 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER that Plaintiffs Request for Reconsideration (ECF No. #7 ) is DENIED, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/27/2018. (evana, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order Dismissing Case, by Petitioner Jason Brooks. (evana, ) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #5 Order Of Dismissal (evana, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (ECF No. #1 ) is denied and the action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. That no certificate of appealability will issue. IFP on Appeal is Denied, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/29/2018. (evana, ) |
Filing 4 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Jason Brooks in the amount of $ 5.00; Receipt Number COX087260; Monthly Payment. (evana, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/18/2018. (evana, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Jason Brooks.(cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.