Fenske v. Medicredit, Inc.
Kim L. Fenske |
Medicredit, Inc. |
1:2018cv02775 |
October 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Michael E Hegarty |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER OF REFERENCE Upon Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge: Pursuant to the parties' consent #13 and 28 USC 636(c), this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Hegarty to fully preside over for all purposes. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/28/18. Text Only Entry (msklc2, ) |
Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Kim L. Fenske All parties consent.. (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 12 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Kim L. Fenske. (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/4/2018. Consent Form due by 12/27/2018. (mdave, ) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kim L. Fenske. Medicredit, Inc. served on 11/12/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent The Outsource Group for Medicredit, Inc.. (Hollars, Jacob) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Jacob Foster Hollars added to party Medicredit, Inc.(pty:dft) by Medicredit, Inc..(Hollars, Jacob) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/2/2018. Plaintiff's counsel will appear by telephone at the Scheduling Conference set for 1/9/2019. Text Only Entry (mdave, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/01/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 1/9/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (mdave, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rvill, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis on behalf of Kim L. FenskeAttorney Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis added to party Kim L. Fenske(pty:pla) (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Kim L. Fenske (Volheim, Nathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medicredit, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6371316)Attorney Nathan Charles Volheim added to party Kim L. Fenske(pty:pla), filed by Kim L. Fenske. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fenske v. Medicredit, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Medicredit, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jacob Foster Hollars |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kim L. Fenske | |
Represented By: | Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis |
Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.