Bridges v. USA
| John C. Bridges |
| USA |
| 1:2018cv02816 |
| November 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Interdistrict Transmittal of Documents via e-mail to The District of North Dakota pursuant to the Order to Dismiss in part and Transfer. InterdistrictTransfer_NDD@ndd.uscourts.gov. Text Only Entry (evana, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL INPARTAND TO TRANSFER CASE. That the clerk of the court transfer the claim challenging the validity of Mr. Bridges' 2013 state court conviction to the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. It is FURTHER ORDERED that any civil rights claim asserted in the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMSISED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for improper venue. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Transfer Habeas Action (ECF No. #5 ), filed on November 13, 2018, and the Motion & Cause to Transfer Habeas Action (ECF No. #6 ), filed on November 19, 2018, are granted in part and denied in part, as set forth above. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 is DENIED as moot, By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/13/2018. (evana, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION & Cause to Transfer Habeas Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) and 1631 by Petitioner John C. Bridges. (Attachments: #1 Notice, #2 Envelope) (athom, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Transfer Habeas Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) and 1631 (w/Cause) by Petitioner John C. Bridges. (athom, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that Mr. Bridges show cause in writing, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to invoke this Court's federal habeas corpus jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 2241. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this action will be dismissed without further notice if Mr. Bridges fails to show cause as directed within the time allowed., by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/5/2018. (evana, )
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner John C. Bridges. (dbera, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION (Petition) for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by John C. Bridges. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dbera, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bridges v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John C. Bridges | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
