Sardakowski v. Romero
Petitioner: James Sardakowski
Respondent: Mike Romero
Case Number: 1:2018cv02925
Filed: November 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION to Clarify re #6 Order Appointing Counsel, by Petitioner James Sardakowski. (evana, )
January 2, 2019 Filing 10 REPLY to #9 Preliminary Response to Habeas Petition, by Petitioner James Sardakowski. (evana, ) (evana, ). (Modified on 1/7/2019 Attached correct PDF)(evana, ).
December 24, 2018 Filing 9 Preliminary RESPONSE to #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Attorney Nicole S. Gellar added to party Mike Romero(pty:res)Attorney Nicole S. Gellar added to party Mike Romero(pty:res) by Mike Romero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E Filing Search Results, #2 Exhibit Notice Claim and Summons)(Gellar, Nicole)
December 4, 2018 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Service of Order to file Preliminary Response and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus upon Michael Romero on 12/4/2018 (evana, )
December 3, 2018 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #6 Order to File Preliminary Response, #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Service of Process. (rroge, )
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order the Colorado Respondents, through the Colorado Attorney General, shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. That within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. That the Prisoner Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #4 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/3/2018. (evana, )
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to ProceedPursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/15/2018. (evana, )
November 13, 2018 Filing 4 Prisoner's MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner James Sardakowski. (rroge, )
November 13, 2018 Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner James Sardakowski. (rroge, )
November 13, 2018 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rroge, )
November 13, 2018 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by James Sardakowski.(rroge, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sardakowski v. Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mike Romero
Represented By: Nicole S. Gellar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Sardakowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?