Nalty v. No Named Respondents
| Stephen John Nalty |
| No Named Respondents |
| 1:2018cv02969 |
| November 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER Applicant Stephen John Nalty filed a document titled "Conditional Offer of Treaty of Peace" (ECF No. #6 ). To the extent Applicant seeks relief from the Court, such request is DENIED as moot. The Court entered an Order of Dismissal on December 21, 2018 (ECF No. #5 ), based on Applicant's voluntary dismissal of this action. This case is closed. Applicant mailed this filing to U.S. Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher in Grand Junction, Colorado. (See ECF No. #6 at 11 ). This is not the proper procedure. Litigants must mail filings only to the Clerk of Courts Office at the following address. Legal correspondence sent elsewhere will be disregarded. Clerk of the Court, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Room A105, Denver, CO 80294-3589, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/2/2019. (evana, )
|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT by Petitioner Stephen John Nalty. (agarc, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL that the "Writ of Mandamus Withdrawing Motion to Entertain Said Affidavits" (ECF No. #4 ), which is construed as a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, is GRANTED as set forth herein. That the voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) is without prejudice and is effective as of December 20, 2018, the date Applicant filed the "Writ of Mandamus Withdrawing Motion to Entertain Said Affidavits" (ECF No. #4 ) notifying the Court of his voluntary dismissal of the action. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/21/2018. (evana, )
|
| Filing 4 Writ of Mandamus Withdrawing Motion to Entertain Said Affidavits by Stephen John Nalty (evana, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. that if Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/19/2018. (evana, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 Writ of Mandamus in the Form of a Motion to Entertain Said Affidavits Fed.R.Civ.P: Rule 8(c), Rule 8(b)(6) and Rule 55(a) (rroge, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nalty v. No Named Respondents | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: No Named Respondents | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Stephen John Nalty | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
