Young v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Young
Defendant: NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan and Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
Case Number: 1:2018cv02987
Filed: November 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Robert E Blackburn
Referring Judge: Michael E Hegarty
2 Judge: William J Martinez
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2019 Filing 20 Proposed Scheduling Order in an ERISA Action by Defendants Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan, NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan. (Junk, Michael)
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER granting #16 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respondto Plaintiff's Complaint by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 01/04/2019. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan answer due 3/1/2019; NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan answer due 3/1/2019. (mdave, )
January 3, 2019 Filing 18 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by attorneyMichael L. Junk. The Attorney has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (cthom, )
January 3, 2019 Filing 17 MEMORANDUM regarding #16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan, NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/3/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
January 3, 2019 Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendants Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan, NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan. (Junk, Michael)
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2018 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED By Judge William J. Martinez on 1 2/12/2018. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Magistrate Judge Hegarty, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED By Judge William J. Martinez on 12/12/2018. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
December 6, 2018 Filing 13 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #11 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-02987-WJM. (Text Only Entry) (tsher, )
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/6/2018 re: #11 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge filed by Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan, NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan. Parties do not consent. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). (tsher, )
December 5, 2018 Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendants Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan, NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan All parties do not consent.. (Junk, Michael)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/3/2018. Consent Form due by 1/15/2019. (mdave, )
December 2, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael L. Junk on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Michael L. Junk added to party Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan(pty:dft), Attorney Michael L. Junk added to party NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan(pty:dft) (Junk, Michael)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/26/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 1/29/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (mdave, )
November 21, 2018 Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, )
November 21, 2018 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-02987-MEH. (athom, )
November 20, 2018 Filing 5 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #4 Order of Recusal. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-02987-REB. (Text Only Entry) (cthom, )
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/20/2018. (cthom, )
November 20, 2018 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No Summons Issued. (rvill, )
November 20, 2018 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (rvill, )
November 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan, NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6404798)Attorney Jeffrey E. Dahl added to party Christopher Young(pty:pla), filed by Christopher Young. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dahl, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan
Represented By: Michael L. Junk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
Represented By: Michael L. Junk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Young
Represented By: Jeffrey E. Dahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?