RAJMP, INC. v. USA
| RAJMP, INC. |
| United States and USA |
| 1:2018cv03045 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| Contract: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Utility Setting/Resetting Deadlines/Hearings: The Scheduling Conference set for February 1, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Varholak is VACATED pursuant to Minute Order #21 . Text Only Entry (morti, ) |
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER granting #19 Motion for Stay of All Deadlines in Light of Lapse of Appropriations. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/28/18. (pabsec)
|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to #19 Unopposed MOTION to Stay all Deadlines filed by Plaintiff RAJMP, INC.. (Ord, Edward) |
| Filing 19 Unopposed MOTION to Stay all Deadlines by Defendant USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Mejia, Christian) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon U.S. Attorney, Bob Troyer (Ord, Edward) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon U.S. Attorney General defendant(s) USA served on 12/6/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Ord, Edward) |
| Filing 16 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to 15 Minute Order. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Philip A. Brimmer. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-03045-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, ) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's #14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is currently pending in this matter. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(2)(a), a civil action in which a motion for injunctive relief is filed shall not be assigned directly to a magistrate judge. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to a District Judge. SO ORDERED, By Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 12/17/2018. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, )
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff RAJMP, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in support of Motion, #2 Decl. of Ted Politte, #3 Decl. of Kelly Politte, #4 Decl. of Michael Drury)(Ord, Edward) |
| Filing 13 Exhibits in Support of #1 Complaint, Exhibit D - Internal Revenue Manual by Plaintiff RAJMP, INC.. (Ord, Edward) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11/30/2018. Consent Form due by 1/18/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 2/1/2019 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (jgonz, )
|
| Filing 11 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, ) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-03045-STV. (athom, ) |
| Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED. Pursuant to #8 Order, This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-03045 REB. (Text Only Entry) (evana, ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DIRECTING REASSIGNMENT This matter is before me upon a review of the file. This case was initially filed as an administrative appeal. Under the local rules of the court, an AP judge manages an administrative appeal through briefing. D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(d); D.C.COLO.LAPR 10.3. Typically, once briefing is complete, the AP case is returned to the clerk of the court to be drawn to a judge under D.C.COLO.LCiv.R 40.1. The judge so drawn resolves the case on its merits. However, after a careful review, I find that the pending case is not an administrative appeal and was not properly assigned to the AP docket. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is returned to the clerk of the court to reassign this case under the random assignment procedure of D.C.COLO.LCiv.R 40.1., by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/30/2018. (evana)
|
| Filing 7 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorneyEdward Ord.Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (dbera, ) |
| Filing 6 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Edward Ord.The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (dbera, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (dbera, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS REQUEST as to U.S. Attorney, District of Colorado re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff RAJMP, INC.. (Ord, Edward) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to U.S. Attorney General re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff RAJMP, INC.. (Ord, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6415092)Attorney Edward Ord added to party RAJMP, INC.(pty:pla), filed by RAJMP, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - RAJMP's Offer in Compromise, #2 Exhibit B - RAJMP's letter, #3 Exhibit C - Copy of the check)(Ord, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
