Foisel v. No Named Respondent
No Named Respondent |
Richard W. Foisel |
1:2018cv03046 |
November 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER. On January 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion entitled "Prisoners Motion & Affidavit for Leave to Proceed as Seaman's Suit Via Tit[le] 28 U.S.C. 1916" (ECF No. #7 ). The motion is DENIED because Plaintiff is not required to move the Court for leave to file an initial pleading in this action. Plaintiff must file a complaint over which this Court has federal subject matter jurisdiction, or a federal habeas corpus petition, by February 6, 2019, along with the appropriate motion to proceed in forma pauperis or payment of the applicable filing fee. (See ECF Nos. #3 , #6 ). by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/22/2019. (angar, ) |
Filing 7 Prisoner's MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed as Seaman's Suit via Title 28 U.S.C. 1916, by Petitioner Richard W. Foisel. (angar, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance to[] Obtain Further Le[gal] Resources (ECF No. #4 )1 is GRANTED. Plaintiff must cure the designated deficiencies by addressing the filing fee and submitting a prisoner complaint or habeas corpus application on or before February 6, 2019. Plaintiff's Motion for Eviden[t]iary Use of Transcript for OCCSSA Test (ECF No. #5 ) is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff requesting state court materials from the relevant state court, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/7/2019. (angar, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Order for transcripts by Petitioner Richard W. Foisel. (evana, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Continue by Petitioner Richard W. Foisel. (evana, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Applicant must clarify whether he desires to open a federal habeas corpus action or file a civil lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Any papers that Applicant files in response to this Order must be labeled with the civil action number identified on this Order. That if Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/29/2018. (evana, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
Filing 1 LETTER by Petitioner Richard W. Foisel. (rvill, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Foisel v. No Named Respondent | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: No Named Respondent | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Richard W. Foisel | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.