Foisel v. No Named Respondent
Defendant: No Named Respondent
Petitioner: Richard W. Foisel
Case Number: 1:2018cv03046
Filed: November 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER. On January 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion entitled "Prisoners Motion & Affidavit for Leave to Proceed as Seaman's Suit Via Tit[le] 28 U.S.C. 1916" (ECF No. #7 ). The motion is DENIED because Plaintiff is not required to move the Court for leave to file an initial pleading in this action. Plaintiff must file a complaint over which this Court has federal subject matter jurisdiction, or a federal habeas corpus petition, by February 6, 2019, along with the appropriate motion to proceed in forma pauperis or payment of the applicable filing fee. (See ECF Nos. #3 , #6 ). by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/22/2019. (angar, )
January 17, 2019 Filing 7 Prisoner's MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed as Seaman's Suit via Title 28 U.S.C. 1916, by Petitioner Richard W. Foisel. (angar, )
January 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance to[] Obtain Further Le[gal] Resources (ECF No. #4 )1 is GRANTED. Plaintiff must cure the designated deficiencies by addressing the filing fee and submitting a prisoner complaint or habeas corpus application on or before February 6, 2019. Plaintiff's Motion for Eviden[t]iary Use of Transcript for OCCSSA Test (ECF No. #5 ) is DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiff requesting state court materials from the relevant state court, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/7/2019. (angar, )
December 28, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Order for transcripts by Petitioner Richard W. Foisel. (evana, )
December 28, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION to Continue by Petitioner Richard W. Foisel. (evana, )
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Applicant must clarify whether he desires to open a federal habeas corpus action or file a civil lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Any papers that Applicant files in response to this Order must be labeled with the civil action number identified on this Order. That if Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/29/2018. (evana, )
November 28, 2018 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rvill, )
November 28, 2018 Filing 1 LETTER by Petitioner Richard W. Foisel. (rvill, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foisel v. No Named Respondent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: No Named Respondent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard W. Foisel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?