Hayworth v. 1st Financial Bank USA et al
Thomas Hayworth |
Equifax Information Services, LLC and 1st Financial Bank USA |
1:2018cv03106 |
December 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Robert E Blackburn |
Kristen L Mix |
Raymond P Moore |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. 1st Financial Bank USA answer due 1/16/2019, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/17/2019. (jgonz, ) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by 1st Financial Bank USA.(Capritta, Leah) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM regarding #15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by 1st Financial Bank USA. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/14/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) |
Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant 1st Financial Bank USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Capritta, Leah) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Leah E. Capritta on behalf of 1st Financial Bank USAAttorney Leah E. Capritta added to party 1st Financial Bank USA(pty:dft) (Capritta, Leah) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Megan Garnett by Thomas Hardy Wagner on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC (Wagner, Thomas) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas Hardy Wagner on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLCAttorney Thomas Hardy Wagner added to party Equifax Information Services, LLC(pty:dft) (Wagner, Thomas) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Carter, Kendall) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Kendall W. Carter added to party Equifax Information Services, LLC(pty:dft) by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Carter, Kendall) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Meryl W. Roper on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLCAttorney Meryl W. Roper added to party Equifax Information Services, LLC(pty:dft) (Roper, Meryl) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/5/18. Scheduling Conference set for 3/27/2019 9:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3) (lgale, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/4/2018. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) |
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/4/2018. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-03106-RM. (athom, ) |
Filing 4 ADVISORY NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: A.J. Stecklein attempted to enter his appearance in this case by affixing his "s/" signature to the complaint with the notation "pro hac vice to be filed." Mr. Stecklein is not a member of the bar of this court, and the local rules of this court do not permit pro hac vice bar admission. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a)(5), his purported appearance will not be recognized. (Text Only Entry) (mfred) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cmadr, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 1st Financial Bank USA, Equifax Information Services, LLC (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6420888)Attorney Matthew Ross Osborne added to party Thomas Hayworth(pty:pla), filed by Thomas Hayworth. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document Summons (1st Financial), #2 Proposed Document Summons (Equifax))(Osborne, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.