Phan v. Babcock et al
Plaintiff: Kent Vu Phan
Defendant: Lewis T. Babcock and Gordon P. Gallagher
Case Number: 1:2018cv03163
Filed: December 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Christine M Arguello
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 02 U.S.C. ยง 0358
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2019 Filing 11 RECORD ON APPEAL Filed as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Kent Vu Phan. Volume I - Pleadings; (USCA Case No. 18-1493). Text Only Entry (athom, )
December 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying as moot #6 Plaintiff Kent Vu Phan's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. The Court entered an Order of Dismissal and Judgment on December 17 and 18, 2018 (Docs. # #4 and #5 . This action is closed. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/30/2018. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
December 28, 2018 Filing 9 USCA Case Number 18-1493 for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Kent Vu Phan. (athom, )
December 27, 2018 Filing 8 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Kent Vu Phan to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid and 1915 motion not filed,) (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Preliminary Record)(evana, )
December 27, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order Dismissing Case, #5 Clerk's Judgment, by Plaintiff Kent Vu Phan. (evana, )
December 27, 2018 Filing 6 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Kent Vu Phan. (athom, )
December 18, 2018 Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 Order Of Dismissal, (evana, )
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL that the Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and this action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (2)(B)(i) and (iii). IFP on Appeal is Denied. That any pending motions are Denied as moot. Case reassigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello for all further proceedings, By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/17/2018. (evana, )
December 10, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, )
December 10, 2018 Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Kent Vu Phan. (cmadr, )
December 10, 2018 Filing 1 Bivens Actions's COMPLAINT against Lewis T. Babcock, Gordon P. Gallagher, filed by Kent Vu Phan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cmadr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phan v. Babcock et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lewis T. Babcock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gordon P. Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kent Vu Phan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?