Rothe et al v. Battelle Memorial Institue
Jason Rothe, Carlos Martinez and Andrew Bryant |
Battelle Memorial Institue |
1:2018cv03179 |
December 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
R Brooke Jackson |
Kathleen M Tafoya |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiffs Andrew Bryant, Carlos Martinez, Jason Rothe All parties do not consent.. (Preston, Sharon) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: I wish to inform the parties that my daughter, who is not a lawyer, works in a clerical position with the law firm of Holland & Hart which represents a defendant in this case. The position is not in the litigation department, and I do not believe her employment would cause any bias or prejudice for or against parties represented by that law firm. Nevertheless, I will respect and honor a request by any party who wishes that I recuse from further participation in this case. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 2/6/19. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. ) |
Filing 17 ORDER finding as moot #10 Motion for Leave to appear by telephone. Upon rescheduling of the scheduling conference, please note to the Court's staff that you would like to appear telephonically. No need to file a new motion. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 2/6/19. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. ) |
Filing 16 ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. In light of the decline of consent to a magistrate judge by one or more of the parties in this case and its reassignment to this Court, the Scheduling Conference set February 11, 2019 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya is VACATED. The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1. The parties are directed to jointly contact Chambers by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date within 14 days of the date of this order. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 2/6/19. (rbjsec. ) |
Filing 15 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #14 Memorandum Returning Case. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-03179-RBJ. (Text Only Entry) (rkeec) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. (rkeec) |
Filing 13 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #12 Consent/Non-Consent to Magistrate Judge Disposition on Motion. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-03179-WYD. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, ) |
Filing 12 CONSENT to Magistrate Judge Disposition on Motion by Andrew Bryant, Carlos Martinez, Jason Rothe re #10 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Telephonically for Scheduling Conference #4 Order. (Preston, Sharon) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER granting in part #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Scheduling Order. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order no later than 12:00 p.m. on February 8, 2019. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/5/19. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) |
Filing 10 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Telephonically for Scheduling Conference #4 Order by Plaintiffs Andrew Bryant, Carlos Martinez, Jason Rothe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Proposed Order)(Preston, Sharon) |
Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiffs Andrew Bryant, Carlos Martinez, Jason Rothe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Proposed Order)(Preston, Sharon) |
Filing 8 NOTICE re #1 Complaint, Submission of Additional Consents to Join Collective Action by Plaintiffs Andrew Bryant, Carlos Martinez, Jason Rothe (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Additional Consents to Join Collective Action)(Preston, Sharon) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Defendant Battelle Memorial Institue shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint no later than 2/11/2019. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 1/8/19. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Battelle Memorial Institue. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Wiletsky, Mark) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mark Brian Wiletsky on behalf of Battelle Memorial InstitueAttorney Mark Brian Wiletsky added to party Battelle Memorial Institue(pty:dft) (Wiletsky, Mark) |
Filing 4 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 2/11/2019 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Consent Form due by 2/4/2019. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/18/2018. (ksena) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (dbera, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Battelle Memorial Institue (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6436613)Attorney Sharon L. Preston added to party Andrew James Bryant(pty:pla), Attorney Sharon L. Preston added to party Carlos Z. Martinez(pty:pla), Attorney Sharon L. Preston added to party Jason William Rothe(pty:pla), filed by Jason William Rothe, Andrew James Bryant, Carlos Z. Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1- Consent Forms, #2 Summons Summons)(Preston, Sharon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.