Mindock et al v. Bruff Dumars et al
| David Mindock and Aspen Glade, Ltd. |
| Christina J. Bruff Dumars and Matthew J Bruff |
| 1:2018cv03240 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| R Brooke Jackson |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 RESPONSE to #21 MOTION to Strike #17 Response to Motion, #19 Response to Motion, filed by Plaintiffs Aspen Glade, Ltd., David Mindock. (Gregory, Robert) |
| Filing 27 REPLY to Response to #12 MOTION to Dismiss Party to Dismiss Defendant Matthew J. Bruff, or Alternatively, Re-align Defendant Matthew J. Bruff as a Party Plaintiff Due to Fraudulent Joinder Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 filed by Defendant Christina J. Bruff Dumars. (Daniel, Lacy) |
| Filing 26 RESPONSE to #15 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Defendant Christina J. Bruff Dumars. (Daniel, Lacy) |
| Filing 25 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Christina J. Bruff Dumars All parties do not consent.. (Daniel, Lacy) |
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Lack of Standing and for Failure to State a Claim Due to Expiration of the Applicable Statute of Limitations filed by Defendant Christina J. Bruff Dumars. (Daniel, Lacy) |
Filing 23
MINUTE ORDER: A Scheduling Conference is set for 3/28/2019 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge R. Brooke Jackson. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 1/29/19. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. )
|
| Filing 22 REPLY to Response to #14 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant Christina J. Bruff Dumars. (Daniel, Lacy) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Strike #17 Response to Motion, #19 Response to Motion, by Defendant Christina J. Bruff Dumars. (Daniel, Lacy) |
| Filing 20 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #19 Response to Motion, filed by attorney Robert N. Gregory.The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (dkals, ) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to #12 MOTION to Dismiss Party to Dismiss Defendant Matthew J. Bruff, or Alternatively, Re-align Defendant Matthew J. Bruff as a Party Plaintiff Due to Fraudulent Joinder Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 filed by Plaintiffs Aspen Glade, Ltd., David Mindock. (Gregory, Robert) |
| Filing 18 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #17 Response to Motion, filed by attorney Robert N. Gregory.The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (dkals, ) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Lack of Standing and for Failure to State a Claim Due to Expiration of the Applicable Statute of Limitations filed by Plaintiff David Mindock. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Response to Motion to Dismiss)(Gregory, Robert) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to #14 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Plaintiffs Aspen Glade, Ltd., David Mindock. (Gregory, Robert) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Plaintiffs Aspen Glade, Ltd., David Mindock. (Gregory, Robert) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendant Christina J. Bruff Dumars. (Daniel, Lacy) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Lack of Standing and for Failure to State a Claim Due to Expiration of the Applicable Statute of Limitations by Defendant Christina J. Bruff Dumars. (Daniel, Lacy) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Party to Dismiss Defendant Matthew J. Bruff, or Alternatively, Re-align Defendant Matthew J. Bruff as a Party Plaintiff Due to Fraudulent Joinder Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 by Defendant Christina J. Bruff Dumars. (Daniel, Lacy) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. Each partys lead trial counsel shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom A-902, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are directed to jointly contact Chambers by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/19/18. (rbjsec. )
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Lacy A. Daniel on behalf of Christina J. Bruff Dumars (Daniel, Lacy) |
| Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #8 Memorandum Returning Case. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-03240-RBJ. (Text Only Entry) (ktera) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE for reassignment by Judge Richard P. Matsch. (ktera) |
| Filing 7 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by attorneyLacy A. Daniel.Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (rroge, ) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER of Defendant Matthew J. Bruff to #2 Complaint by Matthew J Bruff.(rroge, ) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (rroge, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Richard P. Matsch and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against Matthew J Bruff, Christina J. Bruff Dumars, filed by Aspen Glade, Ltd., David Mindock.(rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Christina Bruff DuMars from District Court, Summit County, Colorado, Case Number 2018CV30141. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6443998), filed by Christina Bruff DuMars. (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Record State Court Summons, #2 Preliminary Record State Court Complaint, #3 Preliminary Record State Court Answer by Matthew J. Bruff, #4 Preliminary Record State Court Order re Discovery Protocol, #5 Preliminary Record State Court Order re Duty to Confer, #6 Preliminary Record State Court Waiver of Service by Christina Bruff DuMars, #7 Docket Sheet State Court Docket Sheet, #8 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Daniel, Lacy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
