Worthman v. Prospect Airport Services, Inc.
| Steven Worthman |
| Prospect Airport Services, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv03336 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 USCA Case Number 19-1051 for #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Steven Worthman. (evana, ) |
| Filing 12 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Steven Worthman to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid and 1915 motion not filed,) (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Preliminary Record)(evana, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by Plaintiff Steven Worthman. (evana, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Minute Order Denying Motion to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Steven Worthman. (evana, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Second Amended Complaint. If Mr. Worthman fails within the time allowed to file a second amended complaint that complies with this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/8/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED Employment Discrimination COMPLAINT against Prospect Airport Services, Inc., filed by Steven Worthman.(angar, ) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #6 ) filed January 16, 2019, is DENIED as premature, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/18/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, by Plaintiff Steven Worthman. (angar, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint. If Mr. Worthman fails within the time allowed to file an amended complaint that complies with this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/7/2019. (angar, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/2/2019. (evana, )
|
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Steven Worthman. (dbera, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
| Filing 1 Employment Discrimination COMPLAINT against Prospect Airport Services, Inc., filed by Steven Worthman.(dbera, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Worthman v. Prospect Airport Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Worthman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Prospect Airport Services, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
