USA v. $37,563.61 seized from U.S. Bank Account No. 1-036-8363-5231 et al
USA |
$37,563.61 seized from U.S. Bank Account No. 1-036-8363-5231, $9,273.75 seized from U.S. Bank Account No. 2-036-8690-9037 and $13,816.79 seized from U.S. Bank Account No. 2-036-8690-9029 |
1:2019cv00079 |
January 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
S Kato Crews |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by Plaintiff USA (Andrews, Tonya) |
Filing 5 WARRANT For Arrest of Property In Rem issued by Clerk. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER FOR WARRANT for Arrest of Property In Rem, by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 01/15/19. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (rroge, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against $13,816.79 seized from U.S. Bank Account No. 2-036-8690-9029, $37,563.61 seized from U.S. Bank Account No. 1-036-8363-5231, $9,273.75 seized from U.S. Bank Account No. 2-036-8690-9037 Attorney Tonya Shotwell Andrews added to party USA(pty:pla), filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only), #2 Warrant for Arrest of Property, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Andrews, Tonya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.