Edwards-Hawkins v. Dillon Companies, LLC
| Doris Edwards-Hawkins |
| Dillon Companies, LLC and Dillon Companies, LLC doing business as King Soopers |
| 1:2019cv00108 |
| January 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/22/2019. (bwilk, )
|
| Filing 14 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Scheduling Conference held on 2/22/2019 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Affirmative Experts due 8/23/2019. Rebuttal Experts due 9/23/2019. Discovery due by 10/22/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 11/22/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/15/2020 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall electronically file their proposed pretrial order through CM/ECF, and include a courtesy copy of the proposed order in a Word format sent by email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the conference. FTR: Courtroom A-502. (bwilk, ) |
| Filing 13 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Dillon Companies, LLC. (Larson, Ashley) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/23/2019. A Scheduling Conference is set for 2/22/2019 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bwilk, )
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Debra K. Sutton (Sutton, Debra) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/15/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 1/15/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Adam Burnell Kehrli on behalf of Doris Edwards-HawkinsAttorney Adam Burnell Kehrli added to party Doris Edwards-Hawkins(pty:pla) (Kehrli, Adam) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE re #1 Counterclaim,,, Notice of Removal,, by Defendant Dillon Companies, LLC (Larson, Ashley) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER and Jury Demand by Dillon Companies, LLC.(cmadr, ) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons, Complaint upon Dillon Companies d/b/a iKng Soopers on December 12, 2018 (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 Defendant's NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers from Denver, Case Number 2018CV34470. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6480369), filed by Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M)(Larson, Ashley) Modified to correct document title on 1/15/2019 (cmadr, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
