Simmons v. Goff et al
Jullian L. Simmons |
Goff and Alidrez |
1:2019cv00142 |
January 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 2/14/2019. (sphil, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The PRISONER COMPLAINT #1 and this action is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). ORDERED that the voluntary dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE and is effective as of February 11, 2019, the date Mr. Simmons filed a Letter (ECF No. 3) requesting voluntary dismissal of this action. ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/14/2019. (sphil, ) |
Filing 4 LETTER by Plaintiff Jullian L. Simmons. (angar, ) |
Filing 3 Letter re: MOTION to Dismiss Civil Case by Plaintiff Jullian L. Simmons. (sphil, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Mr. Alidrez, Correctional Officer and Sgt. Mrs. Goff, filed by Jullian L. Simmons. (Attachments: #1 Order from Civil Action No. 18-cv-02815-GPG)(rvill, ) Modified to correct file date on 1/16/2019 (rvill, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.