Bodu et al v. DIRECTV, LLC,
| Kenneth Bodu and James Halladay |
| DIRECTV, LLC, |
| 1:2019cv00149 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Wiley Y Daniel |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0207 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ENTRY OF FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Application for Confirmation and Enforcement of Arbitration Award and Entry of Final Order and Judgment and all papers filed with that motion. (ECF No. #1 ). It is ORDERED that the Parties' Joint Application (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. This Order and the attached arbitration awards comprise the Final Order and Judgment in this case. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court shall close this matter, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (evana, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter for non-dispositive matters. That pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action as follows: (1) Convene a scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. (2) Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause. (3) Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. (4) Alternative Dispute Resolution Authority: Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge, or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. It is further ORDERED that parties and counsel shall be familiar and comply with the above judge's requirements found at www.cod.uscourts.gov. By Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/22/19. Text Only Entry (rkeec)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (dbera, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION (Joint Application for Confirmation and Enforcement of Arbitration Award and for Entry of Final Order and Judgment) (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6488233)Attorney Todd C. Werts added to party Kenneth Bodu(pty:pla), Attorney Todd C. Werts added to party James Halladay(pty:pla), filed by Kenneth Bodu, James Halladay. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Order Granting Claimant's Unopposed Motion for Approval of FLSA Collective Action Settlement re Kenneth Bodu, #2 Exhibit 2 - Order Granting Claimant's Unopposed Motion for Approval of FLSA Collective Action Settlement re James Halladay, #3 Exhibit 3 - Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims re Kenneth Bodu, #4 Exhibit 4 - Arbitration Agreement re James Halladay, #5 Exhibit 5 - Claimant's Unopposed Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement re Kenneth Bodu, #6 Exhibit 6 - Claimant's Unopposed Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement re James Halladay, #7 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Werts, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
