Roberts v. State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company
Plaintiff: James Roberts
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2019cv00319
Filed: February 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER re: #16 Notice (Other) filed by James Roberts. Such filings need not be filed on the court's docket unless and/or until a party accepts such offer of settlement. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/2/2019. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
March 26, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of Service of Plaintiff's Statutory Offer of Settlement by Plaintiff James Roberts (Frankl, Keith)
March 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to the consent of the parties to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge #14 , this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). By Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/25/19. Text Only Entry (pabsec)
March 25, 2019 Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff James Roberts All parties consent.. (Frankl, Keith)
March 18, 2019 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company served on 2/11/2019, answer due 3/18/2019. (Frankl, Keith)
March 18, 2019 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Barker, Nathaniel)
March 18, 2019 Filing 11 Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Jury Demand and Demand for Jury Trial by State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company.(Barker, Nathaniel)
March 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Reset. The Scheduling Conference set for 4/18/2019 is VACATED and RESET to 5/16/2019 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The Consent Form REMAINS DUE by 4/4/2019. Further, the court reminds the Parties that a properly filed stipulation under D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(a) becomes effective on the date of filing, and thus requires no action from the court. Accordingly, Defendant's Stipulation #8 was effective upon filing, rendering its answer or response due by 3/18/2019. Additionally, there is no at issue date under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/13/2019. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
March 12, 2019 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Scheduling/Planning Conference by Plaintiff James Roberts. (Frankl, Keith)
March 4, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint and Jury Demand by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company. State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company answer due 3/18/2019. (Barker, Nathaniel)
February 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/27/19 Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Consent/Nonconsent Form. Consent Form due by 4/4/2019. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 4/18/2019 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
February 7, 2019 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (angar, )
February 7, 2019 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-319-NYW (angar, ) Modified on 2/7/2019 to correct filing date (angar, ).
February 7, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rvill, )
February 6, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (rvill, )
February 6, 2019 Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES re: #1 Complaint filed by attorney Keith Evan Frankl. The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (rvill, )
February 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT And Jury Demand against State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6521563)Attorney Keith Evan Frankl added to party James Roberts(pty:pla), filed by James Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Frankl, Keith)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automible Insurance Company
Represented By: Nathaniel Scott Barker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Roberts
Represented By: Keith Evan Frankl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?