Robinson v. Kellogg-Paisley LLC
| Julie Robinson |
| Kellogg-Paisley LLC and Kellogg-Paisley LLC doing business as Bromley Park Dental |
| 1:2019cv00350 |
| February 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. § 623 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the #21 stipulation to dismiss filed in this case. Text Only Entry. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 21 Joint MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Julie Robinson. (Green, Sara) |
Filing 20
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 03/27/2019. (mdave, )
|
| Filing 19 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews: Scheduling Conference held on 3/27/2019. Discovery due by 10/4/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 11/1/2019. Telephone Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/21/2020 10:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (mdave, ) |
|
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/19/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/19/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
| Filing 16 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #15 Consent/Non-Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-00350-RM. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, ) |
| Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Julie Robinson All parties do not consent.. (Green, Sara) |
| Filing 14 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Julie Robinson. (Green, Sara) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Defendant's Demand for Jury Trial by Kellogg-Paisley LLC.(Smith, Kendra) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Smith, Kendra) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John Edwin Bolmer, II on behalf of Kellogg-Paisley LLC Attorney John Edwin Bolmer, II added to party Kellogg-Paisley LLC (pty:dft) (Bolmer, John) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Kellogg-Paisley LLC may have an extension of time, up to and including 3/14/2019, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. By Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 2/28/2019. Text Only Entry (skclc1)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Kellogg-Paisley LLC. (Smith, Kendra) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING CONSENT/NONCONSENT FORM Scheduling Conference set for 3/27/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Consent Form due by 3/20/2019. By Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 2/20/19. (amont, )
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julie Robinson. Kellogg-Paisley LLC served on 2/13/2019, answer due 3/6/2019. (Green, Sara) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (ktera) |
| Filing 5 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #4 Memorandum Returning Case. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-00350-SKC. (Text Only Entry) (ktera) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE for reassignment by Judge Richard P. Matsch. (ktera) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (dbera, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Richard P. Matsch and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kellogg-Paisley LLC d/b/a Bromley Park Dental (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6527137)Attorney Sara Ann Green added to party Julie Robinson(pty:pla), filed by Julie Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Green, Sara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
