Kark v. Altitude Community Law P.C.
| Laura Kark |
| Altitude Community Law P.C. and HindmanSanchez P.C. |
| 1:2019cv00374 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/26/19. The Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice [#10], filed March 25, 2019, is approved; plaintiff's claims against defendant are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs; plaintiff's Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice [#9] filed March 25, 2019, is denied as moot; and this case is closed. (rebsec)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER : Scheduling Conference set 4/15/2019 terminated per Notice of Dismissal #10 . By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3.26.2019. Text Only Entry (nywlc1, )
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case stipulation of dismissal by Plaintiff Laura Kark (Horak, Steven) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Plaintiff Laura Kark. (Horak, Steven) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Altitude Community Law P.C.. Altitude Community Law P.C. answer due 3/29/2019. (Campbell, Robert) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/21/19. Scheduling Conference set for 4/15/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (athom, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Altitude Community Law P:C by Plaintiff Laura Kark. (Horak, Steven) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), enter a Scheduling Order that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders as appropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, further that the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of Judge Blackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred, subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referred as defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/12/19. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (dbera, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (dbera, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Altitude Community Law P.C. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6528977)Attorney Steven Drosin Horak added to party Laura Kark(pty:dft), filed by Laura Kark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Horak, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
