Watson v. Raemisch et al
| Cleve Watson, Jr. |
| Mary Carlson and Rick Raemisch |
| 1:2019cv00376 |
| February 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Second ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, Respondents shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/10/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 14 Letter requesting Status of Application for Extension of Time and Request for Friend of Court Order and a copy of Register of Action from Cleve Watson (evana, ) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER. Applicant's "Application for Extension of Time & Request for Friend of Court Order" (ECF No. #12 ) is DENIED AS MOOT because Applicant already cured the designated deficiencies in this action. Respondents have been ordered to file, on or before April 8, 2019, a preliminary response to the 2241 Application (ECF No. #6 ) filed March 13, 2019. Applicant may file, within 21 days of the filing of the preliminary response, a reply, if he desires, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/3/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 12 Application for Extension of Time and Request for Friend of Court Order, by Petitioner Cleve Watson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(angar, ) |
| Filing 11 Acceptance of Service upon Dean Williams on 3/20/2019 (angar, ) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #7 Order to File Preliminary Response and #6 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Service of Process. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 9 Acceptance of Service upon Dean Williams on 3/18/2019 (angar, ) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #7 Order to File Preliminary Response and #6 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Service of Process. (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response within twentyone days from the date of this Order that complies with this Order. The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #5 ) is denied as moot, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/18/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Cleve Watson, Jr.(angar, ) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action, by Petitioner Cleve Watson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement)(angar, ) Modified on 3/15/2019 to correct filing date (angar, ). |
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number COX089209 (angar, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies. If Petitioner fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/13/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Cleve Watson.(cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
