Khachatryan v. USCIS National Benefits Center et al
| Samvel Khacatryan and Samvel Khachatryan |
| USCIS National Benefits Center and Colorado Department of Revenue |
| 1:2019cv00483 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #5 Order of Dismissal on 4/3/2019. (angar, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER of Dismissal. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/3/2019. (angar, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Denying #3 Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 2/21/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Samvel Khacatryan. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Colorado Department of Revenue, USCIS National Benefits Center, filed by Samvel Khacatryan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rroge, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
