Nasuti v. Whole Foods Market
| M. James Nasuti |
| Whole Foods Market and WFM-WO |
| 1:2019cv00509 |
| February 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Kathleen M Tafoya |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1962 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 36
ORDER of USCA as to #31 Notice of Appeal filed by M. James Nasuti. (USCA Case No. 19-1128) (cthom, )
|
|
Filing 35
ORDER of USCA as to #31 Notice of Appeal filed by M. James Nasuti. (USCA Case No. 19-1128) (cthom, )
|
| Filing 34 USCA Case Number 19-1128 for #31 Notice of Appeal filed by M. James Nasuti. (cthom, ) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER denying #30 Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis re #31 Notice of Appeal. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 4/8/2019. (cthom, )
|
| Filing 32 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #31 Notice of Appeal filed by M. James Nasuti to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid, 1915 motion filed,) (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet and Preliminary Record)(cthom, ) |
| Filing 31 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #29 Judgment, #28 Order, by Plaintiff M. James Nasuti. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 30 MOTION for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff M. James Nasuti. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 29 FINAL JUDGMENT pursuant to #28 Order to Dismiss Without Prejudice. Entered by the Clerk of the Court on 4/3/2019. (cpear) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: #26 Order to Show Cause is made absolute. This case is dismissed without prejudice and will be closed. Judgment shall enter accordingly. #24 Motion for Order is deemed moot. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 4/3/2019. (cpear)
|
| Filing 27 RESPONSE to #26 Order by Plaintiff M. James Nasuti. (dkals, ) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER On or before Friday, March 29, 2019, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed due to his violation of the stay order in Nasuti I and due to improper claim splitting of his case and this case is stayed for all purposes other than a determination of the show cause order. Defendant's #25 Motion to Stay Proceedings or, in the Alternative, for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading is denied without prejudice as moot. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/18/2019. (cthom, )
|
| Filing 25 MOTION to Stay re #4 Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by Defendant Whole Foods Market. (Rust, Laurie) |
| Filing 24 MOTION "Application for a Rule 65Preliminary and/or Final 'RICO' Injunction; Request for Oral Argument: Declaration of Matthew Nasuti" by Plaintiff M. James Nasuti. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(cthom, ) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER denying #21 Motion to Remand by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/1/2019. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER denying #20 "Motion for an Urgent Rule 1 Evidentiary Hearing" by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/1/2019. (cthom, )
|
| Filing 21 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff M. James Nasuti. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 20 MOTION "For An Urgent Rule 1 Evidentiary Hearing" by Plaintiff M. James Nasuti. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Motion to Consolidate by Defendant Whole Foods Market (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rust, Laurie) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER: Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, a motion to consolidate is to "be filed in the lowest numbered case included in the proposed consolidation and shall be decided by the district judge to whom the lowest numbered case is assigned." Accordingly, the motion #14 is denied without prejudice. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/26/2019. (Text Only Entry ) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/26/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/26/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
| Filing 15 This case was originally assigned incorrectly. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, the case has been directly reassigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-00509-RM-KMT. (Text only entry.) (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Defendant Whole Foods Market. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Rust, Laurie) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 4/22/2019 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 02/22/2019. (ksena)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Filing Additional Documents from State Court Action by Defendant Whole Foods Market (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(McGuire, Grace) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Magistrate Judge Tafoya is designated to conduct ALLMTN proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 90 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for trial accordingly. FURTHER, Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/21/2019. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
| Filing 10 CASE REASSIGNED. pursuant to #9 Memorandum. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-00509-CMA. (Text Only Entry) (cthom, ) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM Exercising my prerogative as a Senior Judge, I request that this action be reassigned, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/21/2019. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Grace LaVance McGuire on behalf of Whole Foods MarketAttorney Grace LaVance McGuire added to party Whole Foods Market(pty:dft) (McGuire, Grace) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge John L. Kane and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 4 First AMENDED Racketeering COMPLAINT against Whole Foods Market, filed by M. James Nasuti.(cmadr, ) |
| Filing 3 Original Racketeering COMPLAINT against Whole Foods Market, filed by M. James Nasuti.(cmadr, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Rust, Laurie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Whole Foods Market from El Paso County District Court, Case Number 2019CV000033. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6543469), filed by Whole Foods Market. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Rust, Laurie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
