Pacific Premier Bank v. Aurora Commercial Corp. et al
| Pacific Premier Bank |
| Aurora Commercial Corp. and Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00549 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| John L Kane |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER re: #17 Notice of Bankruptcy filed by Aurora Commercial Corp. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362, an automatic stay is triggered upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition. The Court, therefore, ORDERS a STAY as to Defendant Aurora Commercial Corp., only, subject to reopening by Plaintiff upon filing with this Court either (1) an order from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District Court of Colorado (Case No. 19-10843) granting relief from the automatic stay OR (2) a notice that the bankruptcy case has been dismissed without a discharge of this obligation having been granted. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/15/2019. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
|
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER granting #18 Motion to Reschedule, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/10/2019. Scheduling Conference is VACATED and RESET to 6/17/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (tsher, )
|
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/10/2019. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. answer due 5/27/2019. (tsher, )
|
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM regarding #18 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Scheduling Conference filed by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/10/2019. Text Only Entry (cmasec) |
| Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Scheduling Conference by Defendant Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Rollin, Michael) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM regarding #15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/8/2019. Text Only Entry (cmasec) |
| Filing 17 Notice of Commencement of Chapter 11 Cases and Stay of Actions Pursuant to Section 362 of the BANKRUPTCY Code by Defendant Aurora Commercial Corp. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (athom, ) |
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Rollin, Michael) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Rollin, Michael) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael Andrew Rollin on behalf of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.Attorney Michael Andrew Rollin added to party Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.(pty:dft) (Rollin, Michael) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pacific Premier Bank. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. served on 3/21/2019, answer due 4/11/2019. (Hanneman, Heather) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pacific Premier Bank. Aurora Commercial Corp. served on 3/21/2019, answer due 4/11/2019. (Hanneman, Heather) |
| Filing 10 Exhibits in Support of #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Pacific Premier Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Complaint)(Hanneman, Heather) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 03/01/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 4/29/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (mdave, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Magistrate Judge Hegarty is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 90 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for trial accordingly. FURTHER, Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/27/2019. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
| Filing 7 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #6 Memorandum. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-00549-CMA. (Text Only Entry) (cthom, ) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM Exercising my prerogative as a Senior Judge, I request that this action be reassigned, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/26/2019. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Pacific Premier Bank. (Hanneman, Heather) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge John L. Kane and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6550450)Attorney Heather Rae Hanneman added to party Pacific Premier Bank(pty:pla), filed by Pacific Premier Bank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Hanneman, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
