USA v. $31,118.60 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account 6982775279 et al
| USA |
| $31,118.60 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account 6982775279, $200,825.06 seized from U.S. Bank Account 103682728615, All funds in American Funds 401k Account, George Sackey Plan ID BRK12722, 3164 Lynwood Avenue, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80126, $310,768.61 seized from U.S. Bank Account 103682728672 and All Funds in George Sackey's American Funds Account |
| Adriana Sackey |
| 1:2019cv00563 |
| February 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Wiley Y Daniel |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Publication by Plaintiff USA (Attachments: #1 Publication)(Hurd, Laura) |
| Filing 13 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #11 Notice of Entry of Appearance, #12 Claim filed by attorney Heather Mitchell. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through the Attorney Services Portal Account pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures. The address on the docket sheet does not match the address on the document filed) (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (evana, ) |
| Filing 12 Third Party CLAIM by Interested Party Adriana Sackey. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Claim Form, #2 Exhibit Copies of Checks)(Mitchell, Heather) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Heather McCord Mitchell on behalf of Adriana SackeyAttorney Heather McCord Mitchell added to party Adriana Sackey(pty:ip) (Mitchell, Heather) |
| Filing 10 Amended WARRANT for Arrest of Property IN REM issued (evana, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER FOR WARRANT for Arrest of Property IN REM, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/11/2019. (evana, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Amended Complaint for Forfeiture by Plaintiff USA (Hurd, Laura) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against $200,825.06 seized from U.S. Bank Account 103682728615, $31,118.60 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account 6982775279, $310,768.61 seized from U.S. Bank Account 103682728672, 3164 Lynwood Avenue, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80126, All funds in American Funds 401k Account, George Sackey Plan ID BRK12722, filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only), #2 Proposed Document)(Hurd, Laura) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Amended Complaint by Plaintiff USA (Attachments: #1 Redline Complaint)(Hurd, Laura) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (rroge, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by Plaintiff USA (Hurd, Laura) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Lis Pendens 3164 Lynwood Avenue by Plaintiff USA (Hurd, Laura) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against $200,825.06 seized from U.S. Bank Account 103682728615, $31,118.60 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account 6982775279, $310,768.61 seized from U.S. Bank Account 103682728672, 3164 Lynwood Avenue, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80126, All funds in American Funds 401k Account, George Sackey Plan ID BRK12722 Attorney Laura Beth Hurd added to party USA(pty:pla), filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only), #2 Warrant for Arrest of Property, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hurd, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
