Sloan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Stephanie Sloan (previously Tuzinovic) and Stephanie Sloan
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2019cv00850
Filed: March 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Philip A Brimmer
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 SCHEDULING ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/13/2019. (bwilk, )
May 13, 2019 Filing 19 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Scheduling Conference held on 5/13/2019 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Parties shall submit a proposed Protective Order on or before 5/28/2019. Discovery due by 11/4/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 12/2/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/5/2020 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall file their proposed pretrial order through CM/ECF, and include a courtesy copy of the proposed order in Word format sent by email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the conference. FTR: Courtroom A-502. (bwilk, )
May 7, 2019 Filing 18 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Lavin, Andrew)
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/22/19. Text Only Entry (pabsec)
April 19, 2019 Filing 16 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #15 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-00850-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (nmarb, )
April 18, 2019 Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Stephanie Sloan All parties do not consent.. (Murphy, Brian)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Continue. Scheduling Conference RESET for 5/13/2019 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Consent Form remains due 4/18/2019. Proposed scheduling order due 5/6/2019. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4.9.2019. Text Only Entry (nywlc1, )
April 8, 2019 Filing 13 First MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Stephanie Sloan. (Murphy, Brian)
April 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NONCONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/1/2019. A Scheduling Conference is set for 5/2/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed order in Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 4/25/2019. The parties shall complete and file the Consent/Nonconsent Form by 4/18/2019. (bwilk, )
March 26, 2019 Filing 11 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (rkeec)
March 26, 2019 Filing 10 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #9 Memorandum Returning Case. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-00850-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (rkeec)
March 26, 2019 Filing 9 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. (rkeec)
March 21, 2019 Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER and Jury Demand to #4 Complaint by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(rroge, )
March 21, 2019 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Summons and Complaint upon State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company on 02/22/2019 (rroge, )
March 21, 2019 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (rroge, )
March 21, 2019 Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (rroge, )
March 21, 2019 Filing 4 Civil COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, filed by Stephanie Sloan.(rroge, )
March 21, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Brian A. Murphy on behalf of Stephanie Sloan (previously Tuzinovic)Attorney Brian A. Murphy added to party Stephanie Sloan (previously Tuzinovic)(pty:pla) (Murphy, Brian)
March 21, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Sheryl Lynn Anderson on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAttorney Sheryl Lynn Anderson added to party State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Anderson, Sheryl)
March 21, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Boulder County District Court, Case Number 2019cv30019. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6594431), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Exhibit D - Articles of Incorporation, #5 Exhibit E - Corporation Disclosure Statement, #6 Exhibit F - Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Docket Sheet, #10 Summons, #11 Defendant's Answer and Jury Demand)(Lavin, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sloan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Represented By: Andrew Keith Lavin
Represented By: Sheryl Lynn Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Sloan (previously Tuzinovic)
Represented By: Brian A. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Sloan
Represented By: Brian A. Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?