Shahid v. Matevousian
Defendant: Andre Matevousian
Petitioner: Ayman Shahid
Case Number: 1:2019cv00862
Filed: March 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2019 Filing 10 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 6/18/2019. (sphil, )
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (ECF No. 1) is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. No certificate of appealability will issue. IFP on appeal is denied, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/18/2019. (sphil, )
June 16, 2019 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT/AMENDMENT to #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioner Ayman Shahid. (Sample, Brandon)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 6/14/2019. ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order Applicant shall file a supplement with the Court addressing whether the Petition (ECF No. 1) is moot. ORDERED that within seven (7) days of the filing of the supplement, Respondent may file a reply, if he desires. (sphil, )
April 14, 2019 Filing 6 RESPONSE to #3 Order to File Preliminary Response by Respondent Andre MatevousianAttorney Lauren Marie Dickey added to party Andre Matevousian(pty:res). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Dickey, Lauren)
April 4, 2019 Filing 5 Return of Service Receipt upon the United States Attorney General re: #4 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court, re: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and #3 Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process on 4/4/2019.(sphil, )
March 25, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and #3 Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 USPS Certified Mail Receipt) (rvill, )
March 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/25/2019. (sphil, )
March 21, 2019 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rroge, )
March 21, 2019 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number 1082-6595543)Attorney Brandon Creighton Sample added to party Ayman Shahid(pty:dft), filed by Ayman Shahid. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Set, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sample, Brandon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shahid v. Matevousian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ayman Shahid
Represented By: Brandon Creighton Sample
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andre Matevousian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?