Muniz v. CarsRememberWhenCompany
Aaron Muniz |
CarsRememberWhenCompany |
1:2019cv00870 |
March 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Michael E Hegarty |
William J Martinez |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service re #14 Order. (lrobe) |
Filing 14 ORDER Granting #11 Motion to Remand. Entered by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/10/2019. (lrobe) |
Filing 13 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #12 Minute Order. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-00870-WJM. (Text Only Entry) (tsher, ) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/3/2019. Due to the lack of consent and the dispositive nature of this case, this Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). (tsher, ) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw #1 Notice of Removal,,,,,,,,,,,,,, to United States District Court [ECF No. 1], Request for an Order of Remand to Douglas County District Court and Request to Vacate April 18, 2019 Status Conference [ECF No.9] by Defendant CarsRememberWhenCompany. (Sauer, John-Paul) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas H. Mitchiner on behalf of Aaron MunizAttorney Thomas H. Mitchiner added to party Aaron Muniz(pty:pla) (Mitchiner, Thomas) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 03/25/2019. Consent Form due by 4/15/2019. Status Conference set for 4/18/2019 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (mdave, ) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 6 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 5 Defendant Cars Remember When Company's ANSWER to Plaintiff's #2 Complaint by CarsRememberWhenCompany.(cmadr, ) |
Filing 4 STATE COURT ORDER: Granting Defendant Cars Remember When Company's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint by Douglas County District Court Judge Shay Kara Whitaker. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 3 RETURN of Service of Summons, Complaint upon CarsRememberWhenCompany on 17 August, 2018 (cmadr, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against CarsRememberWhenCompany, filed by Aaron Muniz.(cmadr, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CarsRememberWhenCompany (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6596685), filed by CarsRememberWhenCompany. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint with Jury Demand, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Civil Summons, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D - Delay Reduction Order, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E - Return of Service, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F - Entry of Appearance, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G - Defendant Cars Remember When Companys Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiffs Complaint and proposed Order, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H - Order Granting Defendant Cars Remember When Companys Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiffs Complaint, #10 Exhibit Exhibit I - Defendant Cars Remember When Companys Motion to Dismiss Complaint Under C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5), #11 Exhibit Exhibit J - Plaintiffs Response to Motion to Dismiss and proposed Order, #12 Exhibit Exhibit K - Defendant Cars Remember When Companys Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Complaint Under C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5), Exhibits A-B, #13 Exhibit Exhibit L - Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Defendants Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss, Exhibit Plaintiffs Surreply, #14 Exhibit Exhibit M - Order re Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Defendants Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #15 Exhibit Exhibit N - Plaintiffs Surreply to Defendants Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #16 Exhibit Exhibit O - Order re Defendant Cars Remember When Companys Motion to Dismiss Complaint Under C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5), #17 Exhibit Exhibit P - Defendant Cars Remember When Companys Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint, #18 Exhibit Exhibit Q - Defendant Cars Remember When Companys Motion for Cost Bond, Exhibit A. proposed Order, #19 Exhibit Exhibit R - Notice to Elect Exclusion From C.R.C.P. 16.1 Simplified Procedure, #20 Exhibit Exhibit S - Initial Case Management Order, #21 Exhibit Exhibit T - Notice of Case Management Conference, #22 Exhibit Exhibit U - Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Motion for Cost Bond Pursuant to C.R.S. 13-16-102(2), proposed Order, #23 Exhibit Exhibit V - Proposed Case Management Order, #24 Exhibit Exhibit W - Defendants Car Remember When Companys Reply in Support of its Motion for Cost Bond Pursuant to C.R.S. 13-16-102(2), #25 Exhibit Exhibit X - Order Granting Defendant Cars Remember When Companys Motion for Cost Bond re C.R.S. 13-16-102(2), #26 Exhibit Exhibit Y - Minute Order, #27 Exhibit Exhibit Z - Plaintiffs Opposed Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Cost Bond and proposed Order, #28 Exhibit Exhibit AA - Order Granting the Extension of Time, #29 Exhibit Exhibit BB - Proposed Case Management Order, #30 Exhibit Exhibit CC - Case Management Order, #31 Exhibit Exhibit DD - Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time to File Cost Bond and proposed Order, #32 Exhibit Exhibit EE - Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Second Extension of Time to File Cost Bond, #33 Exhibit Exhibit FF - Cost Bond Pursuant to CRS 13-16-102, #34 Exhibit Exhibit GG - Colorado Secretary of State Corporation Summary, #35 Exhibit Exhibit HH - Settlement Demand Correspondence, #36 Exhibit Exhibit II - Plaintiffs Initial Disclosures Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 26(a)(1), #37 Exhibit Exhibit JJ - Docket Sheet for Douglas County, Colorado District Court Case Number 2018CV30709)(Sauer, John-Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Muniz v. CarsRememberWhenCompany | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CarsRememberWhenCompany | |
Represented By: | John-Paul Christopher Sauer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Aaron Muniz | |
Represented By: | Thomas H. Mitchiner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.