Thiebeau v. Stroud et al
| James Thiebeau |
| Sean Yang and James Stroud |
| 1:2019cv00905 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Written Discovery to the Individual Defendants by Defendants James Stroud, Sean Yang. (Ziporin, Eric) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to #19 Amended Complaint and Jury Demand by James Stroud, Sean Yang.(Ziporin, Eric) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE re #19 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff James Thiebeau (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Redlined Complaint)(Bryant, Raymond) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against James Stroud, Sean Yang, filed by James Thiebeau.(Bryant, Raymond) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by James Stroud, Sean Yang.(Ziporin, Eric) |
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 5/30/19. (morti, )
|
| Filing 16 MINUTE ENTRY for Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 5/30/2019. Discovery due by 1/31/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 3/2/2020. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/4/2020 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. FTR: 402. (morti, ) |
| Filing 15 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendants James Stroud, Sean Yang. (Ziporin, Eric) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Betsy Lynn Stewart on behalf of James Stroud, Sean YangAttorney Betsy Lynn Stewart added to party James Stroud(pty:dft), Attorney Betsy Lynn Stewart added to party Sean Yang(pty:dft) (Stewart, Betsy) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the #1 Complaint is extended to 6/18/2019. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 5/22/2019. Text Only Entry(stvlc2, )
|
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by James Stroud, Sean Yang. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/22/19. Text Only Entry (pabsec) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendants James Stroud, Sean Yang. (Ziporin, Eric) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/21/19. Text Only Entry (pabsec)
|
| Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED. All parties do not consent pursuant to #8 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-00905-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (agarc, ) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff James Thiebeau All parties do not consent.. (Bryant, Raymond) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Eric Michael Ziporin on behalf of James Stroud, Sean YangAttorney Eric Michael Ziporin added to party James Stroud(pty:dft), Attorney Eric Michael Ziporin added to party Sean Yang(pty:dft) (Ziporin, Eric) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Thiebeau. James Stroud served on 5/7/2019, answer due 5/28/2019; Sean Yang served on 5/7/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Bryant, Raymond) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 5/30/2019 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Consent Form due by 5/16/2019, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 3/28/2019. (jgonz, )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-905-STV (angar, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6603189)Attorney Raymond K. Bryant added to party James Thiebeau(pty:pla), filed by James Thiebeau. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Bryant, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
