Patterson v. King et al
Plaintiff: Rob Allen Patterson
Defendant: Brian Emeson, Paul King and Ken Kupfner
Case Number: 1:2019cv00959
Filed: April 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Referring Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff filed a Motion (ECF No. #15 ) on June 26, 2019. The motion contains threatening, profane, and abusive language. In Plaintiff's own words, "I now rant, rave and stutter trying to simply write or talk about my case." (Id. at #4 ). The motion is DENIED. The Court entered an Order of Dismissal and Judgment on May 9, 2019 (ECF Nos. #7 and #8 ). This action is closed. Further filings in this case will be stricken, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/3/2019.(angar, )
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER. On June 25, 2019, Mr. Patterson filed a Motion (ECF No. #14 ) in which he asks the Court to provide him with copies of all his filings in the 26 cases he has initiated in this Court since 2015. The Motion is DENIED. Mr. Patterson is advised that he is responsible for keeping copies of any documents he files with the Court. The Court is not required to provide photocopies to him free of charge. If Mr. Patterson desires copies of his filings, he must pay $.50 per page (which is the rate set by the Judicial Conference of the United States) in advance for any photocopies he requests, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/3/2019.(angar, )
June 26, 2019 Filing 15 MOTION for Order, by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (angar, )
June 25, 2019 Filing 14 MOTION for Order, by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (angar, )
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Denying Motion to Reconsider. "Request for Court Ordered Copies of Filings" (ECF No. #9 ) is and Refusal of Court to Act on Claims" (ECF No. #11 ), which is construed as motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), are DENIED. The Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #10 ) and Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #12 ) are DENIED as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/12/2019. (angar, )
June 6, 2019 Filing 12 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (angar, )
May 23, 2019 Filing 11 Letter re: Refusal of Court to Act on Claims by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (angar, )
May 15, 2019 Filing 10 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (evana, )
May 15, 2019 Filing 9 REQUEST for Court Ordered copies of filings by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (evana, )
May 9, 2019 Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #7 Order of Dismissal on 5/9/2019. (angar, )
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER of Dismissal. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. All pending motions are denied as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/9/2019. (angar, )
May 6, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Order Examination of Merit Evidence, by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (angar, )
April 26, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Order Examination of Merit Evidence by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (agarc, )
April 15, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Omni-Bus Hearing on Facts, by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (evana, )
April 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/3/2019. (angar, )
April 1, 2019 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, )
April 1, 2019 Filing 1 Request for Omni-Bus Hearing on Facts by Plaintiff Rob Allen Patterson. (cmadr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. King et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Emeson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ken Kupfner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rob Allen Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?