Tallwhiteman v. Neely
| Roy Tallwhiteman |
| Jim Neely |
| 1:2019cv01043 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Wiley Y Daniel |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
This action is reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico upon his appointment and the passing of Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained and will now be handled by Judge Domenico in Courtroom A-702. His chambers are located in A-738 of the Alfred A. Arraj Courthouse. His telephone number is 303-335-2468. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-01043-DDD. Text only entry. (agarc, )
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #5 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay. The Motion is GRANTED for good cause shown. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that all proceedings in this matter are hereby STAYED until Plaintiffs challenges to his criminal conviction in state court are complete. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Notice within 7 days of completion of his state court challenges. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Status Report by 8/5/2019 informing the Court of the status of his state court challenges if they have not been resolved by that date. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/20/2019. Text Only Entry (skclc2)
|
| Filing 11 STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Roy Tallwhiteman. (Wang, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time. For good cause shown, and noting the unopposed nature of the relief sought, the Motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Jim Neely shall have until 6/14/2019 to file an Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (ECF. #1 ) and the Motion to Stay (ECF. #6 ). SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/13/2019. Text Only Entry (skclc2)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM regarding #8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Jim Neely. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/10/19. Text Only Entry (rkeec) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Jim Neely. (Colony, Amy) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Amy Christine Colony on behalf of Jim NeelyAttorney Amy Christine Colony added to party Jim Neely(pty:dft) (Colony, Amy) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roy Tallwhiteman. Jim Neely served on 4/23/2019, answer due 5/14/2019. (Wang, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Case by Plaintiff Roy Tallwhiteman. (Wang, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews for non-dispositive matters. That pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action as follows: (1) Convene a scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. (2) Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause. (3) Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. (4) Alternative Dispute Resolution Authority: Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge, or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. It is further ORDERED that parties and counsel shall be familiar and comply with the above judge's requirements found at www.cod.uscourts.gov. By Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/10/19. Text Only Entry (rkeec)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jim Neely (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6625960)Attorney Elizabeth C. Wang added to party Roy Tallwhiteman(pty:pla), filed by Roy Tallwhiteman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Wang, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tallwhiteman v. Neely | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roy Tallwhiteman | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth C. Wang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jim Neely | |
| Represented By: | Amy Christine Colony |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
