Rodriguez v. USA
| Oscar Rodriguez |
| USA |
| 1:2019cv01082 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| William J Martinez |
| Kathleen M Tafoya |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to #1 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify MOTION TO VACATE AND SET ASIDE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by Petitioner Oscar Rodriguez. (Leedy, Brian) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint Attorney Michael Conrad Johnson added to party USA (pty:res) by USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Johnson, Michael) |
Filing 8
ORDER The United States on or before May 31, 2019, shall file a response to the motion pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/29/2019. (cthom, )
|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM regarding #1 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify filed by Oscar Rodriguez. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/29/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Magistrate Judge Tafoya, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b), to include without limitation issuance of a Report and Recommendation as to the disposition of the merits of the Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/29/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
| Filing 5 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #4 Order. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-01082-WJM. (Text Only Entry) (jgonz, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/26/2019. The Clerk of Court shall have this matter randomly drawn to an Article III District Court Judge forthwith. (jgonz, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Brian Rowland Leedy on behalf of Oscar Rodriguez (rvill, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate and Set Aside Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 by Petitioner Oscar Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Judgment in a Criminal Case for a Petty Offense, #2 Transcript, #3 Colorado Drug Influence Evaluaton Facesheet)(rvill, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Michael Conrad Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Oscar Rodriguez | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey S. Pagliuca |
| Represented By: | Brian Rowland Leedy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
