USA v. Radi et al
| USA |
| Nancy Radi, Nancy Hendricks, Park County, CO, Nancy Colquitt, Denver County, CO, Darloc Enterprises, LLC, Darloc Ventures, Robert Colquitt, Christopher Tracy and Amanda Tracy |
| 1:2019cv01161 |
| April 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| John L Kane |
| Tax Suits |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Because the Motion states the IRS approval process can be up to 75 days, Amanda Tracy's answer is due 9/16/2019; Christopher Tracy's answer is due 9/16/2019. Ordered by Judge John L. Kane on 7/2/2019. Text Only Entry(jlksec)
|
| Filing 11 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond Motion to Place Case in Suspence or to Extend the Time to Respond to Complaint filed by attorney Robert Pitler. The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (cthom, ) |
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond Motion to Place Case in Suspence or to Extend the Time to Respond to Complaint by Defendants Amanda Tracy, Christopher Tracy. (Pitler, Robert) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Two Week Extension to Respond to Complaint. Amanda Tracy answer due 7/2/2019; Christopher Tracy answer due 7/2/2019. Ordered by Judge John L. Kane on 6/17/2019. Text Only Entry(jlksec)
|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond Motion for Two Week Extension to Respond to Complaint by Defendants Amanda Tracy, Christopher Tracy. (Pitler, Robert) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #4 Amended Complaint, by Denver County, CO.(Gorman, Edward) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Edward James Gorman on behalf of Denver County, COAttorney Edward James Gorman added to party Denver County, CO(pty:dft) (Gorman, Edward) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (cthom, ) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Robert Colquitt, Darloc Enterprises, LLC, Darloc Ventures, Denver County, CO, Park County, CO, Nancy Radi, Christopher Tracy, Amanda Tracy, filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Redline Amended Complaint, #2 Summons - Christopher Tracy, #3 Summons - Amanda Tracy)(Watson, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge John L. Kane and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robert Colquitt, Darloc Enterprises, LLC, Darloc Ventures, Denver County, CO, Park County, CO, Nancy Radi a/k/a Nancy Colquitt a/k/a Nancy Hendricks Attorney Ryan S. Watson added to party The United States of America(pty:pla), filed by The United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons (Nancy Radi), #3 Summons (Robert Colquitt), #4 Summons (Darloc Enterprises, LLC), #5 Summons (Darloc Ventures), #6 Summons (Denver County), #7 Summons (Park County))(Watson, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
