PopSockets LLC v. Outlook FBA Corp. et al
| PopSockets LLC |
| Outlook FBA Corp., John (6) Doe, Avi Sakkal, John (8) Doe, John (7) Doe, John (10) Doe, John (9) Doe, John (1) Doe, Outlook Acquisition, Corp, John (4) Doe, John (3) Doe, John (5) Doe, John (2) Doe and Eli Sakkal |
| 1:2019cv01394 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Reset Scheduling Conference and Motion to Extend Related Deadlines. The Scheduling Conference set for 7/25/2019 09:00 AM is VACATED and RESET for 9/16/2019 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. The parties shall file the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form on or before 9/3/2019, and shall submit a joint proposed scheduling order on or before 9/09/2019. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 7/08/2019. Text Only Entry(stvlc1, )
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Reset SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND MOTION TO EXTEND RELATED DEADLINES by Plaintiff PopSockets LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Groves, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by William D. Kloss on behalf of PopSockets LLCAttorney William D. Kloss added to party PopSockets LLC(pty:pla) (Kloss, William) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Rajeev Kumar Adlakha on behalf of PopSockets LLCAttorney Rajeev Kumar Adlakha added to party PopSockets LLC(pty:pla) (Adlakha, Rajeev) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Daren Scott Garcia on behalf of PopSockets LLCAttorney Daren Scott Garcia added to party PopSockets LLC(pty:pla) (Garcia, Daren) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING ELECTION CONCERNINGCONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION FORM AND SETTINGSCHEDULING CONFERENCE; Consent Form due by 7/11/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 7/25/2019 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. On or before July 18, 2019, the parties shall file a joint proposed schedulingorder in the form required pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2., by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 5/24/19. (morti, )
|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 3 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Groves, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF 15 U.S.C. 1114; 15 U.S.C. 1125; C.R.S. 6-1-105; TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE; AND RELATED CLAIMS; AND JURY DEMAND against John (1) Doe, John (10) Doe, John (2) Doe, John (3) Doe, John (4) Doe, John (5) Doe, John (6) Doe, John (7) Doe, John (8) Doe, John (9) Doe, Outlook Acquisition, Corp, Outlook FBA Corp., Avi Sakkal, Eli Sakkal (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6686985)Attorney Matthew Ray Groves added to party PopSockets LLC(pty:pla), filed by PopSockets LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Groves, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
