Storage War Store, LLC et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Mike Pentel and Storage War Store, LLC |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company doing business as Nationwide E&S/Specialty |
| 1:2019cv01689 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David H. Wollins on behalf of Mike Pentel, Storage War Store, LLCAttorney David H. Wollins added to party Mike Pentel(pty:pla), Attorney David H. Wollins added to party Storage War Store, LLC(pty:pla) (Wollins, David) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #3 Complaint and Jury Demand by Scottsdale Insurance Company.(Kroupa, Christine) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of State Court Docket Sheet by Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company (Kroupa, Christine) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John M. Palmeri on behalf of Scottsdale Insurance CompanyAttorney John M. Palmeri added to party Scottsdale Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Palmeri, John) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service by Mail by Clerk of Court re #8 Order to David H. Wollins, David H. Wollins, P.C., 950 South Cherry Street, Suite 512, Denver, Colorado 80246. Text Only Entry (tsher, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 6/12/2019. Consent Form due by 8/21/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 9/4/2019 10:30 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. (tsher, )
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company for Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Kroupa, Christine) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Summons and Complaint upon Scottsdale Insurance Company on 05/21/2019 (rroge, ) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry.. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 3 Verified COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Scottsdale Insurance Company, filed by Storage War Store, LLC, Mike Pentel.(rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Scottsdale Insurance Company from Adams County District Court, Case Number 2019-CV-30878. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6735247), filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 State Court Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 State Court Verified Complaint and Jury Demand, #4 State Court Exhibit 1 to Verified Complaint and Jury Demand, #5 State Court Summons and Affidavit of Service, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Kroupa, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
