Nekouee v. BJRB Holdings, LLC et al
| Fred Nekouee |
| BJRB Holdings, LLC, Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC and BurgersRock3, LLC |
| 1:2019cv01691 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Mark Widmann Gerganoff. The format for the attorneys signature block is not correct - contact information missing from signature block. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(d) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil Cases). (Text Only Entry) (athom, ) |
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING #18 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to #1 Complaint on or before 8/21/2019. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 7/31/2019. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
|
| Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant BurgersRock3, LLC. (Gerganoff, Mark) |
| Filing 17 Utility Setting/Resetting Deadlines/Hearings: BurgersRock3, LLC answer due 7/31/2019 per #16 Stipulation. Text Only Entry (athom, ) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant BurgersRock3, LLC. (Gerganoff, Mark) Modified on 7/18/2019 to correct event text (athom, ). |
| Filing 15 Utility Setting/Resetting Deadlines/Hearings: Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC answer due 7/31/2019 per #13 Stipulation. Text Only Entry (athom, ) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Dodd, Allison) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC.. (Dodd, Allison) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kristina Marie Wright on behalf of Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLCAttorney Kristina Marie Wright added to party Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC(pty:dft) (Wright, Kristina) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Allison Joy Dodd on behalf of Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLCAttorney Allison Joy Dodd added to party Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC(pty:dft) (Dodd, Allison) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant BJRB Holdings, LLC. BJRB Holdings, LLC answer due 7/31/2019. (Rose, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jeffrey Scott Rose on behalf of BJRB Holdings, LLCAttorney Jeffrey Scott Rose added to party BJRB Holdings, LLC(pty:dft) (Rose, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fred Nekouee. Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC served on 6/19/2019, answer due 7/10/2019. (Vincze, Robert) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fred Nekouee. BurgersRock3, LLC served on 6/24/2019, answer due 7/15/2019. (Vincze, Robert) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fred Nekouee. BJRB Holdings, LLC served on 6/19/2019, answer due 7/10/2019. (Vincze, Robert) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/13/19 Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 8/21/2019 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 6/11/2019. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BJRB Holdings, LLC, BurgersRock3, LLC, Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6735473)Attorney Robert Joseph Vincze added to party Fred Nekouee(pty:pla), filed by Fred Nekouee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons BJRB Holdings, LLC, #3 Summons BurgersRock3, LLC, #4 Summons Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC)(Vincze, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
