Samford v. Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc
| James Samford |
| Interstate National Dealer Services,Inc and Interstate National Dealer Services, Inc |
| 1:2019cv01702 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0203 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Interstate National Dealers Services, inc by Plaintiff James Samford. (Jaffer, Shawn) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No Summons Issued. (rsams, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (rsams, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Shawn Jaffer. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through the Attorney Services Portal Account pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry). (rsams, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Interstate National Dealer Services,Inc (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6736996)Attorney Shawn Jaffer added to party James Samford(pty:pla), filed by James Samford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
