Kelley v. EnCana Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Caroline Kelley
Defendant: Encana Services Co. Ltd. and EnCana Corporation
Case Number: 1:2019cv01884
Filed: June 28, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: R Brooke Jackson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. In light of the decline of consent to a magistrate judge by one or more of the parties in this case and its reassignment to this Court, the Scheduling Conference set September 5, 2019 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty is VACATED. The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1. The parties are directed to jointly contact Chambers by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at [email protected] to obtain a scheduling conference date within 14 days of the date of this order. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/21/19. (rbjsec. )
August 20, 2019 Filing 16 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #14 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-01884-RBJ. (Text Only Entry) (tsher, )
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER re: #14 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge filed by Caroline Kelley by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/20/2019. Parties do not consent. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C.Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). (tsher, )
August 20, 2019 Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Caroline Kelley All parties do not consent.. (Finger, William)
August 5, 2019 Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Caroline Kelley. Encana Services Co. Ltd. waiver sent on 7/26/2019, answer due 9/24/2019. (Finger, William)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/26/2019. Consent Form due by 8/22/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 9/5/2019 09:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (tsher, )
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 07/16/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 9/3/2019 is vacated and rescheduled to 9/4/2019 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (mdave, )
July 5, 2019 Filing 10 SUMMONSES issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (tsher, )
July 3, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Encana Services Company, Ltd by Plaintiff Caroline Kelley. (Finger, William)
July 3, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Encana Services Company, Ltd by Plaintiff Caroline Kelley. (Finger, William)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 07/03/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 9/3/2019 10:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (mdave, )
July 2, 2019 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, )
July 2, 2019 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-01884-MEH. (athom, )
July 2, 2019 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No Summons Issued. (rvill, )
June 28, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (rvill, )
June 28, 2019 Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES re: #1 Complaint filed by attorney William Sidney Finger. The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (rvill, )
June 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against EnCana Corporation, Encana Services Company, Ltd. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6767103)Attorney William Sidney Finger added to party Caroline Kelley(pty:pet), filed by Caroline Kelley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Finger, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelley v. EnCana Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Encana Services Co. Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EnCana Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caroline Kelley
Represented By: William Sidney Finger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?