Carrio Cabling Corporation v. Stryker Corporation
Plaintiff: Carrio Cabling Corporation
Defendant: John Doe and Stryker Corporation
Case Number: 1:2019cv01937
Filed: July 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Raymond P Moore
Referring Judge: Kathleen M Tafoya
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 SECOND AMENDED ORDER SETTING Scheduling Conference for 10/22/2019 10:15 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 08/29/2019. (ksena)
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER granting #18 Motion to Vacate and Reset Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for September 4, 2019 is vacated, to be reset by separate order. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/28/19. Text Only Entry(kmtlc1 )
August 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM regarding #18 Unopposed MOTION to Vacate #7 Order and Reset Scheduling Conference filed by Stryker Corporation. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/28/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 28, 2019 Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION to Vacate #7 Order and Reset Scheduling Conference by Defendant Stryker Corporation. (Eady, Shawn)
August 28, 2019 Filing 17 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint Amended Complaint by Defendant Stryker Corporation. Stryker Corporation answer due 9/30/2019. (Eady, Shawn)
August 28, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Shawn Anthony Eady on behalf of Stryker CorporationAttorney Shawn Anthony Eady added to party Stryker Corporation(pty:dft) (Eady, Shawn)
August 28, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Maureen Reidy Witt on behalf of Stryker CorporationAttorney Maureen Reidy Witt added to party Stryker Corporation(pty:dft) (Witt, Maureen)
August 22, 2019 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service re #12 Notice of Filing Amended Pleading, #13 Amended Complaint upon Stryker Corporation by Plaintiff Carrio Cabling Corporation. (Shaffer, Dean)
August 21, 2019 Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Stryker Corporation, filed by Carrio Cabling Corporation.(Shaffer, Dean)
August 21, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading re #1 Complaint, and Jury Demand by Plaintiff Carrio Cabling Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Amended Complaint and Jury Demand)(Shaffer, Dean)
August 21, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Counsel by David S. Chipman on behalf of Carrio Cabling CorporationAttorney David S. Chipman added to party Carrio Cabling Corporation(pty:pla) (Chipman, David)
August 21, 2019 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carrio Cabling Corporation. Stryker Corporation served on 8/20/2019, answer due 9/10/2019. (Shaffer, Dean)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: The #8 Amended Complaint is STRICKEN for failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a). By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/20/19. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 )
August 19, 2019 Filing 8 STRICKEN AMENDED COMPLAINT and Jury Demand Against Stryker Corporation and John Doe against Stryker Corporation, filed by Carrio Cabling Corporation.(Shaffer, Dean) Modified on 8/20/2019 to strike pursuant to Minute Order #9 (jgonz, ).
July 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED ORDER Scheduling Conference for 9/4/2019 09:30 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 07/23/2019. (ksena)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 9/3/2019 09:30 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 07/10/2019. (ksena)
July 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/5/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec)
July 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/5/2019. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
July 3, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rroge, )
July 3, 2019 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) Modified on 7/5/2019 (rroge, ) to correct referral Judge.
July 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against John Doe, Stryker Corporation (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6774479)Attorney Dean Byron Shaffer added to party Carrio Cabling Corporation(pty:pla), filed by Carrio Cabling Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Proposed Summons in a Civil Action)(Shaffer, Dean)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carrio Cabling Corporation v. Stryker Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stryker Corporation
Represented By: Maureen Reidy Witt
Represented By: Shawn Anthony Eady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carrio Cabling Corporation
Represented By: Dean Byron Shaffer
Represented By: David S. Chipman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?