Romero v. Pueblo Police Dept.
| Andrew L. Romero |
| Pueblo Police Dept. |
| 1:2019cv02067 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint. If Mr. Romero fails to file an amended complaint on the court-approved that complies with this order within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/29/2019. (angar, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #7 Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915abd Fed. R. App. P. 24 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #3 ) and a Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 (ECF No. #5 ) are DENIED as improperly filed, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/28/2019. copy sent to Pueblo County detention Center Office (angar, )
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Plaintiff Andrew L. Romero. (angar, ) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff is reminded that the action will be dismissed without further notice if he fails to cure all of the deficiencies within the time allowed, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 8/13/2019. forms mailed as ordered (angar, )
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner's MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant tot 28 U.S.C. 1915 and FED. R. APP. P. 24, by Plaintiff Andrew L. Romero. (angar, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies as directed within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, this action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 7/23/2019 (angar, ) Modified on 7/29/2019 to correct text (angar, ).
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner's MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and FED. R. APP. P. 24 in a Habeas Corpus Action, by Plaintiff Andrew L. Romero. (angar, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Pueblo Police Dept., filed by Andrew L. Romero.(cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Romero v. Pueblo Police Dept. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pueblo Police Dept. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew L. Romero | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
