Young v. Stancil
Warden M. A. Stancil and M. A. Stancil |
Anthony Young |
1:2019cv02488 |
August 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RESPONSE to #6 Order by Defendant M. A. Stancil. (Jafek, Timothy) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Timothy Bart Jafek on behalf of M. A. StancilAttorney Timothy Bart Jafek added to party M. A. Stancil(pty:dft) (Jafek, Timothy) |
Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT of service upon USA on 10/18/2019. (rvill, ) |
Filing 8 Certified Mail Returned Executed upon United States Attorney General for defendant(s) M. A. Stancil, served on 10/18/2019, answer due 12/17/2019. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #5 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #6 Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 USPS Certified Mail Receipts) (cmadr, ) |
![]() |
Filing 5 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Anthony Young.(angar, ) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number COX091831 (angar, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Anthony Young.(cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.