Motto Franchising, LLC v. Perona et al
| Motto Franchising, LLC |
| Gustavo Perona and King Lending, LLC |
| 1:2019cv02574 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER. In light of Plaintiff's #8 Notice of Settlement and Unopposed Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference, dismissal papers shall be filed on or before December 2, 2019. The Scheduling Conference set for November 19, 2019 is hereby vacated. By Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 11/01/2019. Text Only Entry (dddlc2)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement and Unopposed Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Motto Franchising, LLC (Wasserman, Emily) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/17/2019. Scheduling Conference is VACATED and RESET to 11/19/2019 01:45 PM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (tsher, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Emily Lauren Wasserman on behalf of Motto Franchising, LLCAttorney Emily Lauren Wasserman added to party Motto Franchising, LLC(pty:pla) (Wasserman, Emily) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER Pursuant to the Order of Reference, it is hereby ORDERED that the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference shall be held on November 5, 2019, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/12/2019. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on September 12, 2019. Text Only Entry (dddlc2)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6887372)Attorney Jacqueline Ventre Roeder added to party Motto Franchising, LLC(pty:pla), filed by Motto Franchising, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Roeder, Jacqueline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
