Loeb et al v. Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty
| Sharon Handler Loeb and John Loeb |
| Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty |
| 1:2019cv02632 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Kristen L Mix |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/14/19. This matter is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiffs are warned that it is never appropriate to ignore Court imposed deadlines. Proposed Scheduling Order is now due by 2/6/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 11/18/19 at 9:30 AM is VACATED and RESET to 2/13/2020 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER re: #14 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by John Loeb, Sharon Handler Loeb. Being satisfied that cause has been shown and that #13 Amended Complaint adequately alleges facts supporting the Court's subject-matter jurisdiction over this case, #12 Order to Show Cause is hereby discharged. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 10/10/2019. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiffs' Response to Order to Show Cause re #12 by Plaintiffs John Loeb, Sharon Handler Loeb. (Lenyo, David) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT Amended Complaint against All Plaintiffs, filed by John Loeb, Sharon Handler Loeb.(Lenyo, David) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It is ORDERED that on or before 10/10/2019, Plaintiffs John Loeb and Sharon Handler Loeb shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed due to the Court's lack of subject-matter By Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 09/26/2019. (athom, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 9/26/2019. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-02632-DDD. (athom, ) |
| Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #7 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-02632-REB. (Text Only Entry) (nmarb, ) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/25/19 re: #7 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge filed by John Loeb, Sharon Handler Loeb. At least one party in this civil action does not consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case shall be assigned to a District Judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(8) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a). (nmarb, )
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiffs John Loeb, Sharon Handler Loeb All parties do not consent.. (Lenyo, David) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/20/19 Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 11/11/2019. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 11/18/2019 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(4), the deadline to file the Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form [#3] is November 4, 2019. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 9/20/2019. Text Only Entry (klmlc2, )
|
| Filing 4 Administrative Notice: Duplicate filing fee received. Financial notified and a refund is pending. (Text Only Entry) (rsams, ) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Loeb, Sharon Handler Loeb, Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6895766)Attorney David L. Lenyo added to party John Loeb(pty:pla), Attorney David L. Lenyo added to party Sharon Handler Loeb(pty:pla), filed by John Loeb, Sharon Handler Loeb. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lenyo, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
