Ghaemi v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al
| Arash Ghaemi |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc and Synchrony Bank |
| 1:2019cv02716 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 11/20/2019. (slibi, )
|
| Filing 16 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter: Scheduling Conference held on 11/20/2019. Discovery due by 5/29/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 6/24/2020. Joint Status Report due by 3/10/2020. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/13/2020 10:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. FTR: Courtrroom C203. (slibi, ) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/1/2019. (ebuch)
|
| Filing 14 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Arash Ghaemi. (Osborne, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #11 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock. All future pleadings should be designated as 19-cv-02716-LTB. (Text Only Entry) (tsher, ) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically at the Scheduling Conference, by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 10/23/2019. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (tsher, )
|
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Arash Ghaemi All parties do not consent.. (Osborne, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Telephonically at the Scheduling Conference by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Chan, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ryan Ho Wai Chan on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, IncAttorney Ryan Ho Wai Chan added to party Experian Information Solutions, Inc(pty:dft) (Chan, Ryan) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Experian plc for Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Averbach, Robyn) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Robyn Berger Averbach added to party Experian Information Solutions, Inc(pty:dft) by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.(Averbach, Robyn) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Synchrony Financial for Synchrony Bank. (Derwinski, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Anthony E. Derwinski added to party Synchrony Bank(pty:dft) by Synchrony Bank.(Derwinski, Anthony) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 9/23/2019. Consent Form due by 11/6/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 11/20/2019 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. (tsher, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions, Inc, Synchrony Bank (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6907839)Attorney Matthew Ross Osborne added to party Arash Ghaemi(pty:pla), filed by Arash Ghaemi. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed)(Osborne, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
