Relaximals, Inc. v. Brentwood Originals, Inc.
| Relaximals, Inc. |
| Brentwood Originals, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv02721 |
| September 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER granting #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint and Jury Demand. Brentwood Originals, Inc. answer due 11/25/2019.Consent Form due by 11/29/2019. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/27/2019 Scheduling Conference reset for 12/12/2019 11:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/15/2019.(jgonz, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint and Jury Demand by Defendant Brentwood Originals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Lake, Donald) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/12/2019. Scheduling Conference is VACATED and RESET to 11/26/2019 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (tsher, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Relaximals, Inc.. Brentwood Originals, Inc. served on 10/28/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. (Lemire, Peter) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 11/25/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Magistrate Judge Consent Form due by 11/5/2019. ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/24/2019. (cthom, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rvill, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 Report re Copyright: Report on the filing of an action emailed separately to the Director of the Copyright Office. Modified to correct document on 9/24/2019 (rvill, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brentwood Originals, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6909890)Attorney Peter C. Lemire added to party Relaximals, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Relaximals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Civil Cover Sheet, #18 Summons)(Lemire, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Relaximals, Inc. v. Brentwood Originals, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brentwood Originals, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Donald E. Lake, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Relaximals, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Peter C. Lemire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
