Murphy v. Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. et al
Plaintiff: Dianna Christine Murphy
Defendant: Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. and Thomas Schaible
Case Number: 1:2019cv02808
Filed: October 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: William J Martinez
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2020 Filing 135 NOTICE re #124 Order on Motion for Leave to Restrict,, Plaintiff's Notice of Submission of Redacted Documents by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 4 [Dkt. 103-2] redacted, #2 Exhibit 10 [Dkt 103-8] redacted, #3 Exhibit 12 [Dkt. 103-10] redacted)(Curtis, Cory)
September 21, 2020 Filing 134 RESPONSE to #117 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #96 Amended Answer to Complaint filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
September 18, 2020 Filing 133 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Exhibit to #132 : by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy.. (Curtis, Cory) Modified on 9/21/2020 to add title (angar, ).
September 18, 2020 Filing 132 REPLY to Response to #101 MOTION to Compel Document Production from Defendant Thomas Schaible filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 131 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/18/20 GRANTING #126 Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for [#118]; [#118-1]; [#118-2]; [#118-3]; [#118-4]; and [#118-5].(nmarb, )
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER granting #125 Motion for Leave to Depose Plaintiff's Expert After September 5, 2020 Close of Discovery by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/14/2020. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
September 14, 2020 Filing 129 MEMORANDUM regarding #126 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Thomas Schaible. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/14/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
September 14, 2020 Filing 128 MEMORANDUM regarding #125 Unopposed MOTION for Discovery to depose Plaintiff's Expert after September 15, 2020 close of discovery filed by Thomas Schaible. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/14/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 127 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/14/20 GRANTING #122 Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for [#111]; [#111-1]; and [#111-2]. (nmarb, )
September 14, 2020 Filing 126 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Defendant Thomas Schaible. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
September 14, 2020 Filing 125 Unopposed MOTION for Discovery to depose Plaintiff's Expert after September 15, 2020 close of discovery by Defendant Thomas Schaible. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5)(DiGeronimo, Kate)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 124 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/9/2 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part #114 Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to UNRESTRICT [#103; #103-1; #103-3; #103-4; #103-5; #103-6; #103-7; #103-9; #103-11]; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for [#103-2; #103-8; #103-10]; and on or before September 22, 2020, Plaintiff shall file a redacted version of her Exhibits 4 and 10 [#103-2; #103-8] and Exhibit 12 [#103-10], consistent with this Minute Order.(nmarb, )
September 8, 2020 Filing 123 MEMORANDUM regarding #122 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Thomas Schaible. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/8/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
September 8, 2020 Filing 122 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Defendant Thomas Schaible. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
September 4, 2020 Filing 121 RESPONSE to #101 MOTION to Compel Document Production from Defendant Thomas Schaible DiGeronimo Declaration in Opposition filed by Defendant Thomas Schaible. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(DiGeronimo, Kate)
September 4, 2020 Filing 120 BRIEF in Opposition to #101 MOTION to Compel Document Production from Defendant Thomas Schaible filed by Defendant Thomas Schaible. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
September 1, 2020 Filing 119 MEMORANDUM regarding #117 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #96 Amended Answer to Complaint filed by Thomas Schaible. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/1/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
August 31, 2020 Filing 118 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Exhibit to #117 Order : by Defendant Thomas Schaible.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit F, #2 Exhibit G, #3 Exhibit H, #4 Exhibit P, #5 Exhibit Q)(DiGeronimo, Kate) Modified on 9/2/2020 to add title (angar, ).
August 31, 2020 Filing 117 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #96 Amended Answer to Complaint by Defendant Thomas Schaible. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Kate E. DiGeronimo, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit I, #7 Exhibit J, #8 Exhibit K, #9 Exhibit L, #10 Exhibit M, #11 Exhibit N, #12 Exhibit O, #13 Exhibit R)(DiGeronimo, Kate)
August 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 116 MINUTE ORDER re: #107 Telephonic Discovery Conference held on 8/24/2020, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/28/2020. (jgonz, )
August 28, 2020 Filing 115 MEMORANDUM regarding #114 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/28/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
August 28, 2020 Filing 114 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
August 28, 2020 Filing 113 REPLY to Response to #102 MOTION for Leave to Assert a Claim for Exemplary Damages Against Defendants and to File a Second Amended Complaint (Thomas Schaible) filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Curtis, Cory)
August 28, 2020 Filing 112 REPLY to Response to #102 MOTION for Leave to Assert a Claim for Exemplary Damages Against Defendants and to File a Second Amended Complaint (Schaible, Russo & Co.) filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Curtis, Cory)
August 24, 2020 Filing 111 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Exhibit to #110 : by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit B to DiGeronimo Declaration in Opposition, #2 Exhibit Exhibit C to DiGeronimo Declaration in Opposition)(DiGeronimo, Kate) Modified on 8/25/2020 to add title (angar, ).
August 24, 2020 Filing 110 RESPONSE to #102 MOTION for Leave to Assert a Claim for Exemplary Damages Against Defendants and to File a Second Amended Complaint Declaration of Kate E. DiGeronimo in Opposition filed by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
August 24, 2020 Filing 109 RESPONSE to #102 MOTION for Leave to Assert a Claim for Exemplary Damages Against Defendants and to File a Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Haynes, Mark)
August 24, 2020 Filing 108 BRIEF in Opposition to #102 MOTION for Leave to Assert a Claim for Exemplary Damages Against Defendants and to File a Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
August 24, 2020 Filing 107 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Discovery Conference held on 8/24/2020 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. FTR: NYW-CRD. (bwilk, )
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Assert a Claim for Exemplary Damages against Defendants and to File a Second Amended Complaint #102 . Defendants are DIRECTED to file a Response to the Motion on or before August 24, 2020. Plaintiff shall file a Reply in support of her Motion on or before August 28, 2020. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/17/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 105 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/17/20. This matter is before the court pursuant to the Parties telephonic request for an informal discovery conference (Discovery Conference). Joint Status Report, chart or written materials due by 8/20/2020. Discovery Conference set for 8/24/2020 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
August 14, 2020 Filing 104 MEMORANDUM regarding #101 MOTION to Compel Document Production from Defendant Thomas Schaible filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/14/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
August 14, 2020 Filing 103 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Exhibits to #102 : by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 3, #2 Exhibit 4, #3 Exhibit 5, #4 Exhibit 6, #5 Exhibit 7, #6 Exhibit 8, #7 Exhibit 9, #8 Exhibit 10, #9 Exhibit 11, #10 Exhibit 12, #11 Exhibit 13)(Curtis, Cory) Modified on 8/17/2020 to add title (angar, ).
August 14, 2020 Filing 102 MOTION for Leave to Assert a Claim for Exemplary Damages Against Defendants and to File a Second Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Curtis, Cory)
August 14, 2020 Filing 101 MOTION to Compel Document Production from Defendant Thomas Schaible by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Curtis, Cory)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 100 MINUTE ORDER: Based on the Parties' representations, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's deposition will proceed on September 4, 2020, in person, by remote means, or a combination thereof. The deadline for discovery REMAINS SET for September 15, 2020. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/6/2020. Text Only Entry (nywlc1)
August 6, 2020 Filing 99 LETTER re: 98 Minute Order,,,,,, by Defendant Thomas Schaible. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the court based on the contact by the Parties regarding Plaintiffs deposition currently scheduled for August 7, 2020. Based on the representations of counsel, Plaintiff has come into contact with someone who is presumptively positive for COVID-19, and therefore, has been advised to self-quarantine. Defendant wishes to proceed with the deposition as scheduled on August 7, 2020 by fully remote means. Plaintiff indicates that she is not prepared to proceed without her counsels physical presence and is not prepared to proceed remotely. Discovery closes on September 15, 2020, but defense counsel indicates that they have limited availability to conduct the deposition in August or September. To the extent Plaintiff is not prepared to proceed by fully remote means on August 7, 2020, defense counsel will provide their limited days of availability in August and September 2020, and Plaintiff and her counsel may choose one of those dates to proceed either in person or by remote means. If none of the dates defense counsel is available are tenable to Plaintiff and her counsel, the deposition will proceed by fully remote means on August 7, 2020. Given the COVID-19 pandemic and the attendant risks, the preference to proceed in person does not constitute good cause to extend the deadlines for discovery. The Parties shall inform the court of their choice no later than noon on August 6, 2020 so that the court can enter the requisite order. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/5/2020. Text Only Entry (nywlc1)
June 1, 2020 Filing 97 Exhibits in Support of #96 Amended Answer to Complaint by Defendant Thomas Schaible. (Temkin, Barry)
May 29, 2020 Filing 96 AMENDED ANSWER to #33 Amended Complaint, with Jury Demand by Defendant Thomas Schaible. (Temkin, Barry)
May 22, 2020 Filing 95 ANSWER to #33 Amended Complaint, by Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P..(Haynes, Mark)
May 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER granting #92 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/13/2020. Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. shall file its answer on or before 5/22/2020. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
May 12, 2020 Filing 93 MEMORANDUM regarding #92 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/12/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
May 12, 2020 Filing 92 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Haynes, Mark)
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint #20 . Because the Court has now ruled on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint #51 , the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint is moot. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) ("It is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect."); Glass v. The Kellogg Co., 252 F.R.D. 367, 368 (W.D. Mich. 2008) ("Because the original complaint has been superseded and nullified, there is no longer a live dispute about the propriety or merit of the claims asserted therein; therefore, any motion to dismiss such claims is moot."). Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's original Complaint #20 is DENIED as MOOT. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 5/11/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmlc3, )
May 11, 2020 Filing 90 ANSWER to #33 Amended Complaint, by Thomas Schaible.(Temkin, Barry)
May 11, 2020 Filing 89 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Counsel by Mark E. Haynes on behalf of Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.Attorney Mark E. Haynes added to party Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.(pty:dft) (Haynes, Mark)
May 4, 2020 Filing 88 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Status Conference held on 5/4/2020 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The Motion for Extension of Pre-Trial Scheduling Order #83 is GRANTED. The Final Pretrial Conference is RESET to 12/16/2020, at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang in Courtroom A-502. The parties shall file their proposed pretrial order through CM/ECF, and include a courtesy copy of the proposed order in Word format sent by email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the conference. FTR: Courtroom A-502. (bwilk, )
May 1, 2020 Filing 87 RESPONSE to #83 MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Discovery Deadlines filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
May 1, 2020 Filing 86 NOTICE re #78 Restricted Document - Level 1, #81 Order on Motion for Leave to Restrict,, Plaintiff's Notice of Filing Redacted Documents by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Redacted Supplemental Brief, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Redacted Declaration)(Curtis, Cory)
May 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 85 MINUTE ORDER re: #83 MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Discovery Deadlines by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/1/2020. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for 5/4/2020 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All participants shall use the following dial-in information: 888-363-4749, Access Code: 5738976. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
April 30, 2020 Filing 84 MEMORANDUM regarding #83 MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Discovery Deadlines filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/30/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
April 30, 2020 Filing 83 MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Discovery Deadlines by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Temkin, Barry)
April 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's #51 Motion to Dismiss and Denying Defendants' #22 Motion to Disqualify Counsel for Plaintiff. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/28/2020.(angar, )
April 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 81 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 4/23/20 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part #79 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for [#78; #78-1; #78-2; #78-3; #78-4; #78-5; #78-6; #78-7; #78-8; #78-9; #78-10; #78-11; #78-12; #78-13]; and on or before 5/1/20, Plaintiff shall file a redacted version of her Supplemental Brief [#78] and Plaintiff's Declaration [#78-1], consistent with this Minute Order.(nmarb, )
April 14, 2020 Filing 80 MEMORANDUM regarding #79 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/14/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
April 14, 2020 Filing 79 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
March 31, 2020 Filing 78 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief re Court's Order of March 20, 2020 76 : by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dianna C. Murphy, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L)(Curtis, Cory) Modified on 4/3/2020 to add title (angar, ).
March 31, 2020 Filing 77 BRIEF in Support of #51 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)(2) & (6) Supplemental Brief in response to the March 20, 2020 Order filed by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Temkin, Barry)
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint #51 . At the outset, the Court notes the marked deficiencies in Plaintiff's Response #68 with respect to subject-matter jurisdiction. This is particularly troubling in light of the fact that the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction is Plaintiff's burden to establish. Port City Props. v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 518 F.3d 1186, 1189 (10th Cir. 2008). Nevertheless, because the issue is not explicitly addressed by either side, the Court ORDERS the parties to submit supplemental briefing as to whether Plaintiff has Article III standing to bring her breach of fiduciary duty claim, and in particular, what precisely does or does not constitute Plaintiff's injury-in-fact that is fairly traceable to any defendant. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992). The Court also notes that the divorce court appears to have awarded the "SSN" account at issue in this case entirely to Plaintiff (something that, bewilderingly, Plaintiff fails to point out), but that the same apparently cannot be said of the "Voya" account at issue (ECF No. 52 at 11). The parties should address whether this distinction makes a material difference in the analysis of Article III injury-in-fact. In addition to anything else the parties may wish to say about this topic or standing generally, the parties shall specifically address the following potential view of standing: Plaintiff's injury-in-fact is that she has lost control of and access to the SSN account, Voya account, or both, causing her to suffer a concrete economic loss; this injury is traceable to the conduct of at least Defendant Thomas Schaible, who allegedly took actions with respect to these accounts favoring one joint client (Plaintiff's then-husband) over another (Plaintiff); and the Court can redress this injury by awarding Plaintiff money damages equal to the value of what she lost. Does such a scenario properly establish Article III standing? The parties' respective supplemental briefs shall be filed no later than March 31, 2020, and shall not exceed 10 pages in length, exclusive of attorney signature block and certificate of service. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 03/20/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmint1, )
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER denying #55 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/26/20.(nmarb, )
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/26/20 GRANTING #72 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for [#69-3]; and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to UNRESTRICT [#68]; [#68-1]; [#68-2]; [#68-3]; [#68-4]; [#68-5]; [#69]; [#69-1]; [#69-2]; and [#69-4].(nmarb, )
February 20, 2020 Filing 73 MEMORANDUM regarding #72 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/20/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
February 19, 2020 Filing 72 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
February 19, 2020 Filing 71 REPLY to Response to #51 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)(2) & (6) filed by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Temkin, Barry)
February 10, 2020 Filing 70 REPLY to Response to #55 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Temkin, Barry)
February 5, 2020 Filing 69 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Exhibits to #68 : by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 3, #2 Exhibit 4, #3 Exhibit 5, #4 Exhibit 10)(Curtis, Cory) Modified on 2/6/2020 to add title (angar, ).
February 5, 2020 Filing 68 RESPONSE to #51 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)(2) & (6) filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 6, #3 Exhibit 7, #4 Exhibit 8, #5 Exhibit 9)(Curtis, Cory)
February 4, 2020 Filing 67 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Exhibits to #66 ,: by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P)(Curtis, Cory) Modified on 2/5/2020 to add title (angar, ).
February 4, 2020 Filing 66 BRIEF in Opposition to #55 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
February 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/3/20 GRANTING #63 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for [#52, #52-1, #52-2, #52-3, #52-4, #52-5, #52-6, #52-7, #52-8, #52-9]. (nmarb, )
January 28, 2020 Filing 64 MEMORANDUM regarding #63 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/28/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
January 28, 2020 Filing 63 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/24/2020 denying #53 Motion for Leave to Restrict, as the Motion is non-compliant with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2. Moreover, consistent with this court's #50 Order on Motion for Leave to Restrict, Defendants must submit a proposed redacted form and state a basis for their redactions. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER granting #56 Motion for Leave to Restrict by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/24/2020. The court accepts [56-1] and directs that it be docketed separately as the Redacted Version of Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Disqualify Baker & Hostetler LLP #34 and the supporting Declaration of Cory M. Curtis [34-1]. Consistent with this TOE, the Clerk of the Court is directed to restrict [34-1] with a Level 1 Restriction. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MINUTE ORDER re: #55 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/22/2020. Plaintiff's Response due by 2/4/2020. Defendants' Reply, if any, due by 2/11/2020. Text Only Entry (nywlc1, )
January 22, 2020 Filing 58 MEMORANDUM regarding #55 MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/22/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
January 21, 2020 Filing 59 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #53 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by attorney Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo.The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (angar, )
January 21, 2020 Filing 57 MEMORANDUM regarding #56 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/21/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
January 21, 2020 Filing 56 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Curtis, Cory)
January 21, 2020 Filing 55 MOTION to Stay Discovery by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Barry R. Temkin, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Temkin, Barry)
January 21, 2020 Filing 54 MEMORANDUM regarding #53 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/21/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
January 21, 2020 Filing 53 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
January 15, 2020 Filing 52 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Exhibits to #51 : by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 11, #2 Exhibit 12, #3 Exhibit 13, #4 Exhibit 14, #5 Exhibit 15, #6 Exhibit 16, #7 Exhibit 17, #8 Exhibit 18, #9 Exhibit 19)(Temkin, Barry) Modified on 1/17/2020 to add title (angar, ).
January 15, 2020 Filing 51 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)(2) & (6) by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Thomas P. Schaible, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Affidavit Kate E. DiGeronimo, #12 Exhibit A)(Temkin, Barry)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/14/20 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part #44 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for [#34]; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to UNRESTRICT [#34-1]; and on or before January 20, 2020, Plaintiff shall file a redacted version of her Response [#34], consistent with this Minute Order. (nmarb, )
January 7, 2020 Filing 49 REPLY to Response to #22 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Plaintiff filed by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Public Entry for #46 Restricted Document, filed 1/7/2020) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (evana, )
January 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/7/20 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part #29 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Restrict. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to MAINTAIN a Level 1 Restriction for [#21], [#21-3], [#21-4], [#21-5], [#21-6], [#21-7], [#21-8]; [#23-5]; [#23-6]; and [#23-7] and(3) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to UNRESTRICT [#21-1], [#21-2], [#23],[#23-1], [#23-2], [#23-3], [#23-4], and [#23-8].(nmarb, )
January 7, 2020 Filing 47 LETTER re: #43 Restricted Document - Level 1, #46 Restricted Document - Level 1 by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
January 7, 2020 Filing 46 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1: by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P... (Temkin, Barry)
January 7, 2020 Filing 45 MEMORANDUM regarding #44 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/7/2020. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
January 6, 2020 Filing 44 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Curtis, Cory)
January 6, 2020 Filing 43 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1: by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P... (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Kate E. DiGeronimo, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Affidavit Albert Russo, #8 Exhibit 1, #9 Exhibit 2)(DiGeronimo, Kate)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #38 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond re #33 Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/2/2020. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before 1/15/2020. This court will grant no further extensions absent extraordinary circumstances. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/2/2020 denying for lack of good cause Defendants' #37 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Moreover, Defendants offer no explanation as to why lead counsel, upon his return from vacation on 1/2/2020, cannot file a Reply by 1/6/2020. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
December 31, 2019 Filing 40 MEMORANDUM regarding #37 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #22 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Plaintiff filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P., #38 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #33 Amended Complaint, filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/31/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmlc1)
December 30, 2019 Filing 39 RESPONSE to #37 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #22 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Plaintiff filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
December 30, 2019 Filing 38 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #33 Amended Complaint, by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
December 30, 2019 Filing 37 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #22 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Plaintiff by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
December 23, 2019 Filing 36 Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' #22 Motion to Disqualify Baker & Hostetler LLP, filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Public Entry to #34 Restricted Document) Text Only Entry (angar, )
December 23, 2019 Filing 35 RESPONSE to #20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
December 23, 2019 Filing 34 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1: by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Cory M. Curtis)(Curtis, Cory)
December 23, 2019 Filing 33 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P., filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Comparison/Redline of Complaints)(Curtis, Cory)
December 23, 2019 Filing 32 RESPONSE to #29 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
December 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/18/2019 re: #29 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. Plaintiff shall file a Response, if any, to the Motion for Leave to Restrict by no later than 12/23/2019. Text Only Entry (nywlc1, )
December 18, 2019 Filing 30 MEMORANDUM regarding #29 MOTION for Leave to Restrict filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/18/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
December 16, 2019 Filing 29 MOTION for Leave to Restrict by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (DiGeronimo, Kate)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/16/19. (nmarb, )
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM regarding #26 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/13/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
December 13, 2019 Filing 26 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Curtis, Cory)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/3/19. (nmarb, )
December 3, 2019 Filing 24 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Scheduling Conference held on 12/3/2019 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The documents identified in the Initial Disclosures shall be produced on or before 12/18/2019. Parties shall submit a proposed Protective Order on or before 12/13/2019. Discovery due by 7/17/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 8/17/2020. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for 10/14/2020 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall file their proposed pretrial order through CM/ECF, and include a courtesy copy of the proposed order in Word format sent by email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, seven days prior to the conference. FTR: Courtroom A-502. (bwilk, )
December 2, 2019 Filing 23 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Exhibit B to #22 : by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C, #2 Exhibit D, #3 Exhibit E, #4 Exhibit F, #5 Exhibit G, #6 Exhibit H, #7 Exhibit I, #8 Exhibit J)(Temkin, Barry) Modified on 12/5/2019to add title (angar, ).
December 2, 2019 Filing 22 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel for Plaintiff by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Albert Russo, #2 Exhibit A)(Temkin, Barry)
December 2, 2019 Filing 21 RESTRICTED DOCUMENT - Level 1 - Exhibit H to #20 : by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I, #2 Exhibit J, #3 Exhibit K, #4 Exhibit L, #5 Exhibit M, #6 Exhibit N, #7 Exhibit O, #8 Exhibit P)(Temkin, Barry) Modified on 12/5/2019 to add title (angar, ).
December 2, 2019 Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Thomas P. Schaible, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)(Temkin, Barry) Modified on to terminate motion per 91 order 6/24/2020 (angar, ).
November 26, 2019 Filing 19 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
November 26, 2019 Filing 18 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy All parties do not consent.. (Curtis, Cory)
November 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/25/2019. Defendants' Answer due 12/6/2019. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
November 25, 2019 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM regarding #15 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the complaint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/25/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
November 22, 2019 Filing 15 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the complaint, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Temkin, Barry)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/13/2019 construing #13 Letter re: permission to attend Scheduling Conference remotely as a Motion to do the same. The Motion is GRANTED and Defense counsel may appear for the 12/3/2019 Scheduling Conference telephonically. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
November 6, 2019 Filing 13 LETTER re: permission to attend Scheduling Conference remotely by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Temkin, Barry) Modified on 11/13/2019 to add a gavel pursuant to direction from the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Wang. (nmarb, ).
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER construing #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond as the Parties' one stipulation for an extension of time pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(a), by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/30/2019. Accordingly, Defendant's answer or response to the Complaint is due 12/2/2019. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
October 28, 2019 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM regarding #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/28/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
October 25, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Temkin, Barry)
October 24, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dianna Christine Murphy. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Curtis, Cory)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/22/19 Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 11/26/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2019 02:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
October 17, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Marc David Flink on behalf of Dianna Christine MurphyAttorney Marc David Flink added to party Dianna Christine Murphy(pty:pla) (Flink, Marc)
October 11, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo on behalf of Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.Attorney Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo added to party Thomas Schaible(pty:dft), Attorney Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo added to party Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.(pty:dft) (DiGeronimo, Kate)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2018 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10 /9/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Magistrate Judge Wang, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/9/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
October 3, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cmadr, )
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (cmadr, )
October 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6923917)Attorney Cory Murray Curtis added to party Dianna Christine Murphy(pty:pla), filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Curtis, Cory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy v. Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.
Represented By: Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo
Represented By: Barry R. Temkin
Represented By: Mark E. Haynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Schaible
Represented By: Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo
Represented By: Barry R. Temkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dianna Christine Murphy
Represented By: Cory Murray Curtis
Represented By: Marc David Flink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?