Murphy v. Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. et al
Plaintiff: Dianna Christine Murphy
Defendant: Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. and Thomas Schaible
Case Number: 1:2019cv02808
Filed: October 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: William J Martinez
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2019 Filing 19 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy. (Curtis, Cory)
November 26, 2019 Filing 18 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Dianna Christine Murphy All parties do not consent.. (Curtis, Cory)
November 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/25/2019. Defendants' Answer due 12/6/2019. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
November 25, 2019 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM regarding #15 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the complaint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/25/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
November 22, 2019 Filing 15 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the complaint, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Temkin, Barry)
November 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/13/2019 construing #13 Letter re: permission to attend Scheduling Conference remotely as a Motion to do the same. The Motion is GRANTED and Defense counsel may appear for the 12/3/2019 Scheduling Conference telephonically. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
November 6, 2019 Filing 13 LETTER re: permission to attend Scheduling Conference remotely by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Temkin, Barry) Modified on 11/13/2019 to add a gavel pursuant to direction from the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Wang. (nmarb, ).
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER construing #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond as the Parties' one stipulation for an extension of time pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1(a), by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/30/2019. Accordingly, Defendant's answer or response to the Complaint is due 12/2/2019. Text Only Entry(nywlc1, )
October 28, 2019 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM regarding #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/28/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
October 25, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendants Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Temkin, Barry)
October 24, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dianna Christine Murphy. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Curtis, Cory)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/22/19 Setting Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Proposed Scheduling Order due by 11/26/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2019 02:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (nmarb, )
October 17, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Marc David Flink on behalf of Dianna Christine MurphyAttorney Marc David Flink added to party Dianna Christine Murphy(pty:pla) (Flink, Marc)
October 11, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo on behalf of Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.Attorney Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo added to party Thomas Schaible(pty:dft), Attorney Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo added to party Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.(pty:dft) (DiGeronimo, Kate)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2018 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10 /9/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Magistrate Judge Wang, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/9/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
October 3, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cmadr, )
October 1, 2019 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (cmadr, )
October 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas Schaible, Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6923917)Attorney Cory Murray Curtis added to party Dianna Christine Murphy(pty:pla), filed by Dianna Christine Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Curtis, Cory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy v. Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schaible, Russo & Company, C.P.A.'s, L.L.P.
Represented By: Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo
Represented By: Barry R. Temkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Schaible
Represented By: Kate Elizabeth DiGeronimo
Represented By: Barry R. Temkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dianna Christine Murphy
Represented By: Cory Murray Curtis
Represented By: Marc David Flink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?