Preston v. Long et al
| David Preston |
| Phil Wiser and Jeff Long |
| 1:2019cv02918 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Acceptance of Service on behalf of Jeff Long on 11/26/2019. (angar, ) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 Order to File Pre-Answer Response for Service of Process. (rsams, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER. Within twenty-one days from the date of this Order the Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response that complies with this Order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/20/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number COX092821 (angar, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Applicant to Deficiencies. If Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order the action may be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/15/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by David Preston.(cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
