Thomas v. Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse
| Devin Thomas |
| No Named Defendants |
| Alfred A. Arraj Courthouse |
| 1:2019cv02919 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #4 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #6 Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process. (rsams, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Respondent State of Colorado Attorney General shall file a Preliminary Response within twenty-one days from the date of this Order that complies with this Order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 11/25/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00; Receipt number COX092836. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Devin Thomas.(angar, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies. If Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies as directed within thirty days from the date of this Order, this action will be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/15/2019. (angar, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 1 LETTER by Plaintiff Devin Thomas. (cmadr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.